June 16, 2025
![]() |
Tibetan depiction of Yama (विमानपेत) |
Monday:
My views on 'the rights of man' – June 16, 2025
In the era of the supposed "enlightenment", men have invented constructions to justify the moral atrophy of themselves in the form of the transformation into the beast of the liberal and "natural" man – these artifacts produced by the liberal worldview are known as rights, or the rights of man. What then are rights? Rights can be summed up as the individual claim against the world, purely in the material domain, and the resources that are apparent in the world, and there are at least two distinct strands of thought when it comes to rights in the modern era: that of negative rights or just negative freedoms; and positive rights or just positive freedoms. I have no intention to delve into any great detail as it pertains to this negative-positive distinction, since that is outside the scope of this post, but I will just address that distinction in short: positive rights go further than negative rights, for they assume the given individuals right to demand something of others; whereas negative rights only assume the given individuals right to demand something of himself and only secondarily of others, commonly in the form of the invariable imposition of himself onto others in the form of such things as speech or "private property" rights.
Rights can be seen as modern man's reaction to his own material limitations, because they enable man to transform into the beast by justifying the lust and the sin of the beast, often in a Darwinian zero-sum competition of pure animal nature – without the slightest regard for decency and morality. This mindset, the liberal mindset, is the mark of the Kali Yuga and the sign of our late decay. The whole point is to justify lust and sin, in the name of lust and sin, or in other words: the whole point of this enterprise is to chase the meaning of the infidel truth in the heat of the night, in the heat of the materialistic pursuit. Rights are constructions that only exist for the benefit of some men, and these so-called rights will be revoked once they are deemed to be adverse to the enterprise of the beast. Materialism can never provide man with profound insight, because the world is manifest beyond the material, and as such the material is an impossible enterprise in the first place, but modern man has deemed any other way erroneous.
![]() |
Celebrations at the accession of Jahangir (जहांगीर) |
Rights are also not derived from the moral order of the universe – only the noble man that has seen the light and that has reached the transcendental plain and descended back to Earth to observe the moral law can truly be said to have derived his wisdom from the source. Rights are mere constructions created to fill the short term needs of the beast and to divide the world into subdivisions easier for the beast to make claims on, and such has been the true nature of the beast, all in the name of liberalism and supposed liberty. Rights are derived from man's beastly and sinful nature, and they work to enable man to transform into the beast, for only the beast can fully operate under the laws of his own idolatry. The beastly nature of man has been rendered the only right way to be in modern times, and all rights that lay claim to the Earth follows from that principle, the rule of men by beasts, until every last man has made the transition into the beast, and then the world will have ended. I continue to say: depart the material and embrace the close of the Kali Yuga. Do not let this cheap talk of rights fool you, for only weak men willingly transform into the beast – embrace righteousness and the purity of the ascendant above the Earth. Rights are not derived from the celestial order!
Reginald Drax – June 16, 2025.
Comments
Post a Comment