Observations about the world, part one

Photograph of the Atlas globe

What is the point of public transportation? 
Friday – September 26, 2025

The official narrative is that public transportation often in the form of subways/undergrounds/metros, buses, commuter trails, etc are supposed to bring people together in an efficient manner that at the same time enables those people to travel across a certain defined region, often a city or across a part of some municipality or sub-region, and while you can say that the intentions behind public transportation is good, I would have to say that I am not a fan of public transportation and I believe that the idea that people should happily pay taxes, often local taxes, to fun these endeavors is nonsensical. Why is it that the state should be allowed to make it so hard for men to travel without having to both pay for it and force them to come together across social lines, across the strata created by the anthropological limit/distance in any given society. Notice that there are two ideas that confluence around what is public transportation: the first is of course egalitarianism and the second the idea that people should seek egalitarian means of relating to other men, so in a sense it's really all about egalitarianism. Why is it that the humanist state requires men to seek egalitarian relations with other men? Well, according to the principles of the humanist axiom you should expect men to always think of and claim their identity as a member of a certain social strata, but do also notice that it is these very same people that claims that egalitarianism is a noble and good thing that also constantly imposes these identities on men, and that you are often not even allowed to question why this identity has been imposed on you. Why are you a political object? Indeed, this is the purpose of public transportation or really any public policy that aims to impose the principles of the humanist axiom and the serpent's propaganda on you will take this form and you may think of it as a form of "social engineering" a term that many of these people, the proponents of the humanist axiom, will use, but in this context they may refrain from using it, simply because they probably won't think of something as mundane as public transportation as a major social project. Indeed, if the capitalist principles were followed in complete, there should be no such thing as public, unless a group of free men came together and decided to pay for the transportation of other people. Well, I will admit that anything that is used on a large scale by a lot of people could be construed as "public", but in this context think of public as something that is provided by the government. Of course, another central feature of public transportation or really anything public is the concept of the citizenship, the relation between the individual man and his government, and public can therefore be thought of the domain in which all free men, the men that are allowed to travel across the land that defines some particular state, are allowed to coexist. Indeed, by proclaiming the salience of public transportation and other public utilities you are also imposing order on those men, but this order is not a natural and organic order, this is a state imposed order, a order of fiat, derived from the humanist axiom and based on the ideological shadow realm. What kind of order that would arise naturally and organically among men requires each man to be of equal standing? No such order exists on its own naturally, and the defining feature among men is always and has always been material standing, but do not allow this to fool you, for the ultimate goal of the humanist axiom and really any ideological school is to further the material order, not to challenge it. If you seek to depart from the material domain you mustn't allow this talk of egalitarian coexistence fool you. I refuse to go by public transportation, but this is because I have retired from the world and if you have yet to retire from the world I believe that you should consider doing this by quite frankly ceasing to rely on public transportation. Indeed, the single point of life and of existence that has been crammed into and compressed into the political object, the individual, perfectly encapsulates this relation to the world that most men have, for they have embraced fully the beastly form and they've been trained to follow the herd yet think of themselves as the foundational unit of society, the individual. This is nothing but a great travesty.

    While this may be a simple and rather obvious observation about the world I thought that it was important for me to attempt to describe it and this has inspired me to create another series on this blog called "Observations about the world" and this post will be part one of that. My intention with this series is to simply describe certain and interesting aspects about the material domain that showcases the times that we live in, the era of the Kali Yuga. I also want to admit that there are material or political reasons as to why you should oppose public transportation, but I do not intend to entertain them in this post, but from a purely capitalist point of view, something I touched in in the previous section, there really is no room for public transportation if you allow capitalism to tend towards its logical conclusion, but one must also then of course recognize that politics while being an instrument of the by and for the material order is mainly concerned with its constituents and most of those people would not favor unfettered capitalism, not during this iteration of the Kali Yuga. I foresee however much more of a pure capitalism being applied during the technological axiom, the emerging paradigm that we now stand before, but it is still too early to tell and even if I am right that would still take some time. I can also admit indeed that there are aspects about public transportation that can serve a good purpose, but what I am trying to explain is why I also believe that there are dark and sinister motives behind the imposition really of the concept of public and one aspect of that is of course public transportation: indeed it can perhaps be efficient in allocating people or reallocating people, if you choose to view people in that way, but the ideological underpinnings of public transportation has to be understood if you are to understand why I have a non-ideological critique of public transportation. It is all well and good to get lost in different kinds of ideological and technological arguments, but they do not address the reality of why public transportation exists, and that point has to be hammered home.

    Finally, I want to end this post by providing an alternative for those men who are still in the world but that seek to get away from the material order. I understand that it is easier said than done that you should depart the material world and as Jesus of Nazareth said: "leave all your worldly possessions behind", but this serves a purpose that I have covered in the past and that I won't rehash/reiterate here. I believe that instead of going by public transportation that you simply could buy a car, but I also realize that in most corners of the world, the government/the state has imposed on you the problem of transportation, since that state likely will and do claim dominion over the roads, whether or not those roads are public or private, and this has of course created the problem of the need to acquire a driver's license in order to operate a vehicle within the strict confines of the law. Indeed, from this perspective public transportation can be thought of as a completely imposed problem: the state essentially gives you no other alternative than to either pay them or pay them; you simply cannot get away from having to deal with the state and this is by design, something I have also covered in the past. You could also create a friend group of like minded far-seeing men and travel in that way. Perhaps one or two members of the group have access to a car or some other means of transportation that isn't public? Sat Sri Akal (ਸਤਿ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਅਕਾਲ).

Reginald Drax – September 26, 2025.