Should you reject medical intervention?

Suruga Satta kaijo (駿河薩多海上)
Utagawa Hiroshige (歌川 広重)

Should you reject medical intervention?
Monday – September 29, 2025

Quick note: This is a somewhat controversial issue and I once again need to reiterate that I am by no means a medical professional and I am not trying to give medical advice. The purpose of this post is simply to explore the ethics of rejecting medical intervention, from a metaphysical point of view. I am by no means trying to suggest that someone should reject medical intervention, unless they themselves have reached that conclusion. This is not me trying to coerce someone into or convince someone to reject medical intervention. This is just my opinion.

    To begin with, it is clear that from a perhaps more oriental and fatalist point of view, rejecting medical intervention would be in keeping with the tradition that all things happen for a reason and are bound by the intentions of the laws of the cosmos, and from this point of view it would therefore make perfect sense to not resist the flow, but to just allow it to take you where it pleases, even if this could hypothetically mean that you end up losing your life. Of course, many modern proponents of medical ethics would reject this sentiment and label it not only fatalistic but also nihilistic. From my point of view, I see little use in resisting the will of the creator, or rather the motions of the universe, and I believe that more often than not, disease is a sign of what man should expect to come: the divinely inspired vengeance of the creator, and while this vengeance may seem indiscriminate, one must understand that there's nothing indiscriminate about the application of the moral law, and that we're all the firing line.

    What does it mean to reject medical intervention? Well, before I may answer that question I feel that it would be a good idea to try to explain what I mean by medical intervention: the concept of modern medicine is a rather recent invention and for most of human history it was up to the body to either fend off disease or not, and if the body was unable to defend itself from disease and illness the person died and this was accepted as fate, but in modern times men are resisting, they are rebelling against the laws of nature, for they view the eventual and approximate downfall of man by disease as oppression, as if the universe and the creator of the universe has decided to spite them personally. For me it is simple: once you have acquired a disease that is terminal, your life is over, and it is indeed foolish to attempt to resist this. But why? Well, let's consider disease: often diseases that actually kill people come from the inside, you may call them demonic, and to resist these kinds of illnesses would indeed be to resist yourself and your own body. Who has imposed these diseases and these illnesses on man if not himself and his own very being? Indeed, and this is why the rapid evolution of technology has to include the abolition of the body, indeed the abolition of the human condition, and this is the goal of the material order. The final victory in man's crusade against the natural order has to be the final defeat of the prison that is the body: that dastardly form made of flesh. You may even say that there's something grand in the picture of man's body being destroyed by his own inventions, in his own war against nature: the body has to be symbolically dissolved and replaced by the anti-body. Flesh is disease ridden, it rots, and it decays, it has to be replaced by perfection, the final form, and the final form transcends beyond humanity. This is why disease has to be prevented before it can have time to rear its ugly head, and perhaps vaccines are the best ways to treat disease today before it has had time to fester inside the body. The final solution is to end man, this is the only way. From this point of view I am in favor of medical intervention and the best form of medical intervention has to be medical intervention that occurs before disease has had time to fester. I am all in favor of destroying the human form, for it deserves to be absolutely annihilated, and indeed you may also say that the human form was created sick; man was born sick. Indeed, the human form is ugly, for it was created sickly and ugly. This cannot be said about the form of the apex predator, excellent in form and feature.

    So should you reject medical intervention? As I stated at the start: I don't call on anyone to reject medical intervention, but if you truly want to accept medical intervention then you should embrace the post-human form, for that will ensure that you won't acquire any diseases, and if you insist on remaining in your current dilapidated form, then go ahead and accept medical intervention because you're gonna need it. Seriously, are you out of your mind? You're nothing but an ape. You should really be destroyed and devoured by the apex predator, but because you have entered into a covenant with the serpent you are still here, and I have to contend with you and your flesh and your ugly, sick, disgusting human form. Indeed, you are a plague on the planet, but this is also why you are merely a transitional state; make no mistake about that, you fowl human. I am writing this because this is true: man entered into a covenant with the serpent a long time ago, and this is reflected by all major metaphysical traditions, and perhaps by Judaism and Christendom the most. But at the close of this our era of the Kali Yuga, men will pay, all those men who embraced the flesh and the beastly form will pay! I believe that once humanity has been abolished the post-human form will take on the universe and truly make the material order aware of itself, but this will be in the distant and post-human future, and until then I have to contend with the ocean of humanity: that raving and populist horde of savage fanatics that will still cling on to the noise of the humanist axiom. Let the post-human form stand as a testament to the futility of humanity and of "brotherly" love and solidarity; let the might of the righteous stomp this shameful and depressing episode in the history of the universe into the ground. I also believe that rejecting medical intervention should be rooted in some kind of fatalism, a profound respect for the moral boundaries of the universe, an insight that only men of ascendant rank can truly be said to possess. If you wish to not reject medical intervention, then don't but don't complain when you find yourself stuck in a prison that you can't get out of. From a radical point of view: death should be seen as good, but proponents of the humanist axiom will never accept this view; for them the only reason for being is the crusade against the natural order. Shame on them! Shame on them!

    To conclude this little post: yes if you are convinced of the good in yourself, the source, then you should reject medical intervention, but if you accept medical intervention, then you must also accept the post-human future; you may not call yourself an honest person that is not hypocritical otherwise. Look, I don't give a shit what you do or what you think of my stance, but I know that your body and your flesh is ugly and sick, and I also know that you've got two options: either you follow the directions of the creator, or you follow the material order, but you may not try to do both. Your body is disgusting and sick, and that's precisely because it was made that way, but you will likely not accept that, but again I don't give a shit. And yes, you are ugly, at least compared to the tiger, and all the other apex predators, all the creatures that have been formed by the love of the creator and that exist to uphold the celestial order; much unlike cosmic agents of chaos and disorder like yourself. Indeed, you are an agent of cosmic disorder, and this is why disease and illness is what your form tends towards. When did men of the true warrior class die in battle? A very long, long time ago; indeed far prior to our days. This is another reason why you should embrace celibacy: either you embrace the post-human form or you submit to the creator.

Reginald Drax – September 29, 2025.