August 21, 2025

Symbolic Head c. 1890 Odilon Redon

Thursday:
Monarchy, good or bad? | August 21, 2025

Under the republican rubric derived from the humanist axiom, it has come to be considered by the plebeian horde and its proponents, the serpents nest, quite bad and immoral to be ruled by one man, a monarch, but indeed, monarchy was commonplace not that long ago and it would have been considered outrageous by most men throughout time, to be ruled by rulers that do not derive their power from the divine providence of the creator, and this is why the rationalist mindset has been imposed on the masses by the serpent's nest: for it would be impossible to justify power without the concept of the "natural" man as the liberal man aching to be liberated from his material circumstances, which is what the revolutionary elite has claimed to have done with the imposition of democracy and egalitarianism on the world, something that has and will have dire consequences during our era of the Kali Yuga. Monarchy was, form a historical perspective, not so much a system of government as it was a natural law and something quite normal and expected by most common men, for the monarch and his lords ruled the land by divine decree, and as such they also had to take the ultimate responsibility in front of the creator (Yahweh), but with the advent of democracy and egalitarianism, each man has been rendered equal in an enterprise that can not be described as equal: namely to govern and to impose the moral law derived from the celestial order. Indeed, the idea that men of different ranks should share power will, and has invariably lead to catastrophe and strife among men, but this is yet another sign of our times: the Kali Yuga. The monarch, the King, did not derive his mandate to govern from any humanist ideas about the loving brotherhood of man or tolerance: the monarch was essentially selected by the creator to govern and to impose the celestial order, and in that sense the monarch can be said to have represented the creator, to have been the ambassador for the ascendant on Earth, as the monarch was the only man in the land of such distinction, for he was the only man that had truly deserved the highest rank and therefore the highest honor, but also the most responsibility. Such things as valor and fortitude used to mean something, but they have today also been reduced to nothing but fancy humanist notions and ideas about the fundamentally equal nature of all men: they have essentially been democratized and reduced to material artifacts earned by the man least qualified, and as such the atrophy of quality and of life in general continues under the democratic and republican rubric of "love", "tolerance", and "peace", when indeed none of these notions actually mean anything they espouse to mean. Verily, meaning itself seems meaningless in the modern world, and if a man of high rank were to actually clearly define meaning in our modern world, he would be labeled an obstructionist and a hate monger, for everything that challenges the humanist axiom is labeled evil and hateful. Any substantive inquiry into the many falsehoods and illusions being peddled in the modern world will very likely at the very least label you a rearguard and hateful man that needs to be re-educated into the totalitarianism of our days. So it's not a matter of monarchy being good or bad, for a monarchy, and some exist, today would be just as depraved and just as corrupt as a republic in name, for those monarchies are indeed monarchy in name only and they do not represent the divine nor the sacred: all modern day states derive their power from the material, not the divine, and as such they are all equally corrupt and corrosive. The fact that a state has the world "Kingdom" in its name does not rectify the spiritual harm and the influence of the serpent.

    The concept of, the modern concept of, government has much more to do with the serpent, for in days gone by there was no such thing as the government, for in those days men fought to uphold the celestial order and that was the basis for men surrendering their will to the King, and as such the justification for the King was complete. With the modern advent of such things as democracy and egalitarianism, it has become unavoidable that power should be a source of corruption and that government should be a natural law, and in the government of the revolutionary elite the man with the largest purse and the man that can use the power of propaganda wins, but as they win the moral boundaries of the universe becomes challenged and challenged until the Earth is pushed out of its orbit and then God's wrath is made a necessary action to put the Earth back into its proper orbit. The monarch on the other hand, requires no propaganda, he requires no consent, for his very being in power is enough to uphold the celestial order, or it used to be enough and if we're going to talk about democracy, then the monarch can be said to have been democratically elected by the fact that people submitted to his rule and also because the land would fall into utter chaos or barbarism without the monarch, but this is of course something that most modern men would reject, for them the citizenship is the what counts and what matters, not man's loyalty to the King and to the land, for according the the reasoned man of the humanist axiom it would be quite normal for any man of any creed to just walk into one land and become familiar with that land, and without showing any respect or regard to the King of that land; this is indeed the gay and blasé ways of modern men and it shows. It shows in how the world and specifically the moral domain has devolved and with it how man has devolved and made himself a creature lower than that of the most primordial animal. Of course, man is an animal that in many respects have been made sick and depraved and as such there should be no man in our days, but the creator has extended his hand of protection to men, but in the era of the Kali Yuga, when men grow into fanatical self-love and idolatry, the creator (Yahweh) removes his hand of protection and the forces of the universe make themselves ever apparent, yet modern man will not heel. Monarchy used to be the only thing keeping man in good graces with the celestial order, but no longer is this the case; subsequently man finds himself lost on the high seas. Verily, modern man is deserving of this fate, tragic as though it may be.

Madhubani painting depicting
a dancing Shiva (शिव)

    In the end, monarchy or not, nothing will save modern man from his divinely ordained fate of being shaken from the planet by the wrath of the creators divine vengeance, and even if some men where to attempt to turn this eventual course of history, do remember that all of this is inspired by the divine providence. Also, men that claim to be Kings in the modern days are false Kings, and they do not represent the divine, and if they claim to represent the divine, which they do, they are false prophets and should be dethroned and forced into abdication, something the revolutionary elite won't allow for, since the King of modern day nations acts as nothing but a liberal figurehead of the elite that can be used to further the cause and the propaganda of the serpent. In our days there is no legitimate monarchy, particularly not in the imperial core. As far as democracy is concerned: it's not the egalitarian nature in and of itself that is wrong, but rather that democracy is cosmically opposed to the natural order and as such democracy is a promoter of cosmic disorder and disharmony, and it is surely the case that the plebeian horde is well suited to that form of propaganda. But do not fear, this is all a part of the divine plan and in the end it will be fine, but this will be at the dawn of the new era, the era of rebirth. In the meantime, before the close of this our era of the Kali Yuga: I call on each man that wishes to earn his true rank to embrace celibacy and remain pure both in conscience and in body, for that will suit you well in the era of rebirth. In the end I will say that Monarchy is not good, but that is because it is untimely.

Reginald Drax – August 21, 2025.