July 22, 2025
 |
| Buddhist depiction of an Apsara (अप्सरस्) playing music |
Tuesday:
Homosexuality! | July 22, 2025
In the modern day and in particular within the imperial core, the act of homosexual intercourse is widely accepted as something quite natural and in line with God's intention for his creation, though with some islands of resistance in this ocean of confusion, and verily homosexual intercourse is viewed by and promoted as a "sexual orientation" by institutions such as the United Nations (UN), and the World Health Organization (WHO). For instance the WHO, in it's report on "Sexual health, human rights and the law", claims that sexual health is: "the integration of the somatic, emotional, intellectual and social aspects of sexual being, in ways that are positively enriching and that enhance personality, communication and love"; and that "...the dimensions of sexuality and sexual health that go beyond reproduction were given less attention in subsequent programmes and policies [prior to 1994].". Now, what could that blabber be all about you may ask? Well, it's quite clear from the report that the supposed World "HEALTH" Organization doesn't view sexual intercourse, of any kind may I add, as serving the main and sacred function of reproduction, but rather as an act that should serve the pleasure of man in the moment, and with that axiom laid out it becomes perfectly clear why homosexual intercourse and other sexual practices that are unnatural and against the celestial order should be accepted, in the name of "tolerance" of course, for they are derived from the axiomatic truth that the only thing that matter are the things that suit man in the given moment, such as sexual pleasure. Sexual intercourse is not viewed by the revolutionary elite as the sacred and natural bond between man and women in harmony with the celestial order, seeking to further their destiny, but rather as a right, a positive right, and more importantly a need, a need to sin and to deprive the soul of purity, and in its report the WHO doesn't call on man to reject sin, lust, and the call to enter into a pact with Satan, but instead encourages sin, by proudly proclaiming the "health" aspects of sexual intercourse, while at the same time minimizing the disease caused by sexual intercourse committed outside the sacred and natural bond of man-woman, such in the case of homosexuality and many other deviant and depraved acts.
I do need to make it clear that I in no way am trying to specifically target homoerrodically attracted persons, because I do not view homoerroticism in and of itself as an act of sin more than any other eroticism, but rather its application in the sexual arena, or really the material domain is what I view as sinful, for sexual intercourse between male-male or female-female participants is something quite impossible and not what the creator intended for humanity or indeed any other sentient life, and as such unexpected and often adverse consequences should be expected for the individuals engaging in such acts. My critique of homosexual intercourse stems from my view that sexual intercourse of any kind is immoral, unless it serves both the instrumental and sacred purposes of creating more life; anything outside of this I deem immoral, including sexual intercourse male-female without the intention of creating more life. Homosexual intercourse is therefore in this context, the most depraved and the most advanced form of rebellion against the ways of nature, for the only purpose of such intercourse would be for the perceived betterment of man's material conditions, in the form of hedonistic self pleasure, while the soul becomes more diseased and more possessed by demons. The purpose of practices such as celibacy and sexual abstinence is to nurture man's vital essence and ensure his moral purity, for the man that can reject lust, the call to do evil, has shown that he is a man that can uphold the celestial order and stand for the moral and the pure, for that man will not allow himself to reduce other men to mere sexual objects, nor will he allow himself to become the sexual object of other men's desire; verily that man cannot be said to be of any kind of sexual attraction, but especially not the homoerotic kind. Again, I do not judge any man of homoerotic desires harder than I judge a man of heteroerotic desire; it is the act in the physical sense that I deem immoral and nature has shown the immorality in the homosexual act.
 |
| Four-armed Chenrezig (अवलोकितस्वर), Avalokiteshvara |
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination." — Leviticus, chapter 18, verse 20.
"Indeed, you approach men with desire, instead of women. Rather, you are a transgressing people." – The Qur'an, Surah 7, verse 81.
Both of these verses showcases that Yahweh in the primordial traditions of both Christendom and the Islamic world as a reflection of the parochial peculiarities of those regions (Europe, Africa, and Asia) views homosexuality as an abomination and something that is not only sinful but purely of evil intent; it is indeed evil in both of those traditions to engage in homosexual intercourse and to engage in such desire as well. Of course, in Christendom it is sinful to engage in any kind of sexual desire. I do not however, share the view that homoerotic desires constitute a disease or condition of man, for my view of man is that he is fundamentally sick and depraved, regardless of his erotic desires; the fact that man desires the meat is already a sign of his depraved and diseased nature to begin with and any suggestion that homoerotic desires are outstanding in this regard I do reject. Verily, homoeroticism, in my view, comes about in the confluence of male camaraderie and the need to worship or to seek a better man, and for the man of weak and confused constitution it becomes quite natural to grow libido for men of higher rank. Homosexuality is just another avenue of perversion and decay in the modern world, as such it is yet another sign of the Kali Yuga.
Reginald Drax – July 22, 2025.
Comments
Post a Comment