August 23, 2025
![]() |
Unknown depiction of the Buddha (बुद्ध) in meditation |
Saturday:
Is passivity good? | August 23, 2025
First and foremost, what does it mean to be passive? To be passive is to act without material intention, it is to act without the purpose of setting some material quantity into motion, and it is to exist in full harmony with nature and with the intended ways of the creator (Yahweh) – to exert spiritual and divine influence. To be passive is also to enter the clear state: the state of full meditation, and in that moment the man has become one with the creation, he has successfully entered the transcendental plane, and as such he is able to exert much influence without any material effort. To be passive is therefore good, but most men in our modern world know not of this word, or more specifically, they know not of the proper application of this word: these men exist in a disharmony with the sacred and the divine, for they are under the influence of the serpent. Our world, the modern world, is constructed around action and motion; it is not constructed around sacred and divine traditions and ways of knowing. This is because what matters to modern man is the material and the perpetuation of quantities; modern man is not motivated by sacred and profound wisdom, he is motivated by a sense of hurry, for his mind is under the control of the serpent, but in reality there is no reason for hurry if you do not seek to further the agenda of the beast and the ways of the serpent. Of course, I must admit that most men are not aware of this and they would not accept that their minds are under the influence of the serpent, even if this is the truth, for they would deny this truth as superstition and "unreason". So in the end, meditation could be a form of passivity, but what matters is not whether you are meditating or not, but whether you are actually passive or not, and there are surely many men under the misconception that they are meditating in full, when they indeed are doing no such thing. But this post is not about meditation and I am also not a guru, but I do recommend this practice if you are attempting to gain skillful means. There are also many other perhaps more "esoteric" ways of becoming more passive, and then there are drugs, and while I am usually against addiction or against becoming addicted I do recognize the spiritual and medicinal in, the material domain, value in drugs, but since it would be illegal for me to recommend you taking drugs I will not recommend you taking any drug. I will however add this caveat: I believe that drugs can serve as agents of healing from a spiritual point of view, but this is only the case if the drugs are handled correctly, and more often than not men fall into the dark cycle of addiction, where the serpents call for lust corrupts your mind and kills your soul, and in the end this typically leads to the death of the ego, a topic that I intend to cover at another time. I will also add another thing about drugs: opioids such as opium, heroin, and morphine can work to put you into a passive mode, and these drugs are in that sense divine agents, but you are much too likely to handle them incorrectly, and they are also likely to be illegal, something that will only add to their subtle fascination and this in turn serves the intentions of the revolutionary elite. Then there are drugs that are not or cannot be said to work as agents of the sacred and the divine: these drugs are typically such things as amphetamine, cocaine, and caffeine; these drugs are evil and would be a sin if taken. Again just to clarify: I am not recommending that you should take drugs, I am just presenting my views on drugs as they pertain to the subject of passivity and as such some work in favor of passivity and some work against passivity. Drugs are however more often than not misused because the serpent has made the case that drugs are meant to be used as an escape, when the real and proper intention is to use drugs to enter a higher plane and a different dimension all together, which is quite the opposite of escape.
I would like to provide some examples in general life when it can be said to be acceptable to be passive and when it can be said to not be acceptable to be passive. Verily, if you are a monk then you should always be passive, but if you are not a monk it would create many adverse problems in your life if you were to be passive in all contexts at all times, and it's quite understandable than no man can be expected to always be passive, and indeed this was not the original intention of the creator; only very few men many claim to be passive at all times and these men are truly of rank. Take the example of a man that is a hard worker: his boss is now demanding of him that he should work even harder, in order to keep up with the ever increasing material demand and commotion of the modern world, what should this man do? Well, this man must embrace passivity in his life if he expects to continue to be able to go on in the material world, and while I may not know this man specifically, I would call on him to exist the modern world, to retire from the world and start practice the divine and the sacred arts of the ancients, the men who walked upon the Earth long before our time, the era of the Kali Yuga, but in lieu of that I would say to the man that he must enter into a proper state of meditation, but this will be hard, and if he does not have the time to do this, then he may be lost to the serpent. Look, I don't like to call anyone lost to the serpent, and that's why drugs may be important, but since it is illegal to suggest anything to do with drugs in this part of the world I will say this: he, the man in the example, could consult a doctor, specifically a psychiatrist, but the psychiatrist is likely not operating with the intention to work for the benefit of the all, and that means that this should only be a last resort, for that psychiatrist could help the man out with drugs. In the end, there is also the third option: to quit that job, for that boss is not deserving of the man in the example's devotion and hard work, but this is a purely material consideration, but could be an option. I would still call on that man, the man in the aforementioned example, to try to find enough courage to seek the light and exit this world. If you used to be in the word you will surely know of what I am referring to.
![]() |
Tibetan thangka of the Chemchok Heruka (ཆེ་མཆོག་ཧེ་རུ་ཀ་) |
Reginald Drax – August 23, 2025.
Comments
Post a Comment