100% wrong – freestyle

"Balance" by Rob Wicks

100% wrong |
Friday – January 30, 2026

In temporal matters, at any rate, I am 100% wrong 100% of the time. Well, I guess I could qualify this initial sentence by stating that I am 99.9% sure of that statement, but this means that there's a 100% chance that the 1% chance of me being wrong is true. I guess that's true, but forget about the semantics and the numbers for a while: look, I suck at most things and it's true, I am almost always 100% wrong, and this has meant for me that in most cases I've had to basically begin to solve a problem by first doing the wrong thing, and then doing the wrong thing again, until I'm eventually forced to solve the problem. I guess this is why I'm good at solving equations? Well, I guess I'm not good at solving equations. But I want to keep being serious here, I am not good at anything almost, so I guess you can say that if I state something, that you probably should do the very opposite thing of that. Am I being hard on myself? Nah, this is reality, but this is reality in the temporal domain, and I guess this is the reason why I am no longer in the world, because once you become aware enough about the world, the world just has a funny way of making you wrong. See, I'm tired of being wrong all the time, but this is also not humility because there's no such thing as humility anyway. No, I am a material consequentialist, and I know that life in the temporal domain can suck a lot and that's why you should not listen to me or elect me any kind of leader. I would never ever accept a leadership position of any kind, because I am not meant to be a leader, and if you have an issue with that, then take it up with the Creator. I know that I am being too personal in this text, but I believe that it's important to be personal in this post because after all, this post belongs to the "Personal Notes series", and since I'm a writer without skill I hope you can try to bear with me. Again, these are only material concerns, and I really don't want to go on about myself for too long, and if you do want to know me more, then you should read this post and skip this post, or I guess that you could come back and read this post at a later time; I really don't care if you read my post or not, or if I'm just talking/texting/writing into the internet void. But to get more serious: yes, I am wrong, you are wrong, and everyone is wrong, and often we're wrong more often than not. See, the world is constituted in a fairly simple way: either you are right or you are wrong, and this means that almost everyone is wrong. Yes, you can always qualify your error and attempt to push it closer to reality, and this is essentially the entire point of the materialist order, but you may only approach reality so far before you push the entirety of the Earth across the cliff, and this is the core problem with modernity, but that's a topic for another day that you may read about here as well. This tendency to attempt to make lies and falsehoods become truth is not actually not a new thing, and I hold that this attempt to make falsehood into truth, untruths, have been a tendency inherent within humanity since the days of even the most distant past, but today this insanity has been pushed to its limit, and what modern men refer to as "mysticism" and religious confusion is actually very much what they themselves are engaging in, but they are not able to see this themselves. This of course would prompt any thinking man, any man that is truly contemplating, to ask if it's actually true that modern men are better off under this materialist regime, compared to the past? While I refuse to answer that question, since it belongs in most part to the temporal domain, I will state this: whether the particular material circumstances at any given time could be considered more adverse or not compared to the modern world is really of no metaphysical importance. Yes, it may be that people had a better or worse life due to the lack of material abundance, but let me also state this clearly: I am not opposed in principle to the reign of quantity, but I am opposed to the metaphysical and hierarchical inversion inherent in this attitude, and whether or not life was better or worse can therefore only be said to be of a very limited and really secondary importance. Really, I think the best way to describe this material reign is to describe it as a continual lack of skill and a depletion of skill, really a erasure of true knowledge, and this is the real problem; actually most other things apart from the depletion of knowledge are of no importance, but since they cannot be separated out from knowledge itself, it also becomes impossible not to mention them and point to them, such as the case of the general lack of an upstanding moral character in the modern world, but many other issues could be mentioned in this connection, and I would even so far as to claim that the problems arising from a lack of knowledge are infinite, or the approach infinity just as fast as modern men are attempting to redefine the world, read "The end of history".

    Yes, I am wrong at least 100% of the time, and this can be asserted with great and sensible means, something that I've never denied. Let it therefore be stated again that I do not assert that there is no room for reason in life: indeed, reason makes human sense of the temporal domain and can help protect from demons, but reason is not enough to understand the world and certainly not enough to rule the world. How long should men without skill rule before they realize that they are 100% wrong? Until the end of this era – the Kali Yuga.

Reginald Drax – January 30, 2026.