On disarmament

Photograph of an anti-war poster
By Nataliya Melnychuk

On disarmament |
Thursday – October 30, 2025

It seems that most governments today choose to spend more and more on armaments and it also seems that people in general both fear and agitate in favor of war, and of course this could seem somewhat contradictory, but when you think about it, it does actually make some sense. See, most governments will at the very least agitate for the defense of the nation-state, and they will be more happy than not to instill fear and hysteria among the general public, for their own selfish purposes, something I've covered in my post on patriotism. Do not fall for the great lie of the nation; the evolutionary elite only relies on this great lie to make you step in line. Is war a great thing? Well, most people would say no, but most people would also say that war is sometimes a "necessary evil" to prevent a "greater evil". Of course this is complete nonsense and this nonsense represents a form of paranoia and propaganda. See, most of these issues, war in this example, come down to materialist concerns. There are indeed a great many people that seek to earn a great profit from war, and while they earn a great profit, you suffer for you only belong to the plebeian horde without any autonomy. First and foremost, I don't think there's ever really been a true disarmament, and what historians refer to disarmament has more often than not been the liquidation of old equipment and the reorganization of old military units and on occasion some of those military units may have been disbanded, but never permanently, because you see, in modern times war is a constant: men fight over resources and influence and the further away men have departed from the creator and the light, the more destructive and all encompassing these wars have become and today one could quite confidently assert that another major and global conflagration would likely destroy most if not all of civilization, all in the name of those civilizations. There is no moral core in the world, there are only thoughts about ever greater material profit and comfort, and the mentality, the beastly mentality of the zero-sum always seems to take over, even among the revolutionary elites. But who will fight these wars? You and your sons will fight these wars, something I've covered in the past, and that's also why the nation-state lie is so important: you need a good reason to fight and die for the establishment, so they convince you of the absolute and paramount importance of your political object, even though they also pretend or want you to pretend that you are an individual in an ocean of other individuals with the same rights. It's all a great and vast lie: these people don't care about the nation and they surely don't care about you; these people are evil and they represent the serpent. When you allow yourself to acquire the beastly form, you essentially give up your autonomy to Satan and you become a pathetic and sad creature, but indeed most men in modern times would trade nothing for this opportunity, but that's because they cannot bear the hardships of the material domain. Violence is wrong, but somehow they want you to believe that violence can be righteous? Look, I understand that there are situations in which you have no other alternative but violence, but war is something entirely different from say self-defense: when you defend your own person you are engaging in legitimate self-defense; but when you are engaging in war, you are killing and bombarding people who pose no threat to you and indeed you are engaging in something that can and will eventually destroy an entire civilization. How is war self-defense? Well, it's not because it can't be self-defense. The definition of war should be constant and continual mass destruction and nothing in this action can and should ever be considered self-defense. Self-defense has nothing to do with destroying persons that are not involved, but you see, the political object of each person invokes that person in the war, and if you care to read more about political object then you should read my "Collectivism & Individualism series".

    I believe that people that claim that armaments will help save the day have good intentions, for these people don't understand and they don't know that they are being manipulated. But if you are a man with far-seeing eyes, I urge you to reject war and violence, especially in the name of modern man's crusade against the natural order. I am in favor of all forms of disarmament including nuclear disarmament but I believe that disarmament has to happen is a certain order: I believe that all armies and all military units/formations have to be abolished before nuclear weapons should and can be abolished, because it would likely be a stupid idea to first abolish nuclear weapons and then expect the peace to last. But of course, there is no peace in this world and as long as the plebeian horde continues to dance after that populist tune there can be no peace. What kind of democracy won't even allow for men to dissent in the face of war? No kind of democracy, but that's because there is no such thing as democracy. Democracy was always an enormous fraud.

    I don't predict any great moves towards real disarmament because indeed we live in the era of the Kali Yuga and that does mean that what you can only expect is war, but that doesn't mean that you should give in to the materialist order. Resit and keep resisting the call to war.

Reginald Drax – October 30, 2025.