Personal Note XXI

Yahweh in (יהוה‎):
Moses and the Burning Bush

My views on western intervention |
Tuesday – December 9, 2025

Most people don't like to be invaded, and I think the most poignant example of this fact was when a young Taliban man was asked why he'd joined the Taliban in the first place, this was during the invasion and occupation of most of Afghanistan by the United States: he basically said that he'd joined the Taliban because they, the U.S. Army, had invaded his valley. Indeed, what wouldn't some men do in that situation and do we really expect this to be a weird or strange reaction to an invasion? And what about this nation-building exercise? What nation is there to talk about in Afghanistan? Was this young warrior loyal to the Afghan nation? No, he was loyal to his valley and to his immediate people, he didn't have a conception of a larger Afghan nation, and why would he? Should we expect otherwise? No, of course not, and this all just goes to show how silly and more importantly how wrong these people are, the proponents of the humanist axiom that is: of course most men in Afghanistan have no interest in western and liberal dogma, they're not liberal waiting to be liberated by the merciful U.S. Army. No, the men that can will resist when there homes are being invaded, by communists, as in the case two decades earlier, or by liberals, because first and foremost they hold their loyalties close to home and close to the Earth, they aren't some believers in universal notions of a larger brotherhood of man. No, most men in Afghanistan will join the Taliban when you invade their valley and they will rightfully resist your colonial attempt to impose this "nation" on them, this liberal and modern concept that is foreign to them. What else could and should've been expected? Yes, the hubris of the modern man was indeed true in the case of Afghanistan, but do understand that these people won't give up, because they truly believe in all of this nonsense and they believe that they are God, and that only they are the true moral arbiters of the universe: to the liberal man there's no such thing as culture, a people, a history, a way of doing things, integrity, etc, because to the modern man we're all the same and we're all, in our natural states, liberal men that are just waiting on someone to liberate us from our primitive ways. This is all of course nonsense, absolute and complete nonsense, but again what makes the revolutionary elite dangerous is that they actually believe in their own rubbish, in their own lies. But the revolutionary elite has, as I previously mentioned, made it quite easy for themselves: to them it would be perfectly normal and good for a man to want to defend the materialist order and they would shame any man that wouldn't, yet they have no concept of this when it comes to all of the places that they claim to have a duty, a moral calling, to destroy and absolutely turn upside down, again all in the name of liberal humanism. But of course, if all men are the same and essentially equal, then why not expect them to react to your invasion with open arms? It all makes sense, as long as you continue to further and entertain the propaganda of the serpent.

    What does this moral duty to protect and intervene mean? Well of course, if you take this idea to its logical conclusion the implications are vast, both for the countries that would be invaded and for the people in the imperial core, who all of a sudden are expected to uphold western style law and order around the world. How can this not be colonialism and imperialism? Well, the obvious answer is that yes this is a form of imperialism but they've just re branded it, and do also not forget that the British Empire and the French Empire made it very clear that they were simply invading all sorts of places in an attempt to enlighten the obscure and distant parts of the world. But the implications go further than that: should you have to expect your son to be swept away from you in the middle of the night so that he can go, likely against his will, to a distant and remote corner of the world and "civilized" the brutes of that place, people who likely just want to be left alone? I don't think so, but why not? Forced conscription seems to be commonplace these days, especially in the Imperial Core: your son, because he is apparently western and likely white, has a moral duty to defend and uphold democracy and the liberal order around the world, not because you think so or because he wants to, but because the revolutionary elite wants it to be so. Of course, on a daily basis your son is not expected to be different from these so-called primitives and brutes of the third world, and he can and will be replaced without hesitation, but not when it comes to war, then the revolutionary elite would prefer to arm him, and only in that context he is apparently essentially different from everyone else, and only he has the responsibility to uphold the imperial system. Weird and contradictory isn't it? I mean, who else are they going to send overseas? To destroy all of these people, their culture, their way of life, and their pride is no problem as long as all of them get to become enlightened and aware, and your son will pay that price, because only he can spread democracy and liberalism around the world, yet those same people that are now being liberated can and will replace him.

    No, I am profoundly against any more interventions carried out by the Imperial Core, because they are evil. I do not mind taking a stand against evil. At some point, near the close of the Kali Yuga, this disease, this sickness, will be cured, but until then don't expect anything to change in good ways.

Reginald Drax – December 9, 2025.