Personal Note XXXVII

Yahweh in (יהוה‎):
Moses and the Burning Bush

My views on the concept of "Gender-queer"|
Wednesday – February 18, 2026

If you're interested in my post about "gender", then you may read it here, or here, your choice. I'm in a "fun" mood today, but I didn't link to anything besides what I told you that I was linking to. You don't know what I'm referring to, but it's very funny to me. Here's a clue: it rhymes with chick and it isn't Barack Hussein Obama. What now? What did I mean by that last sentence? Well, I meant that Obama rhymes with Osama, but that wasn't what I was referring to. See, what I just did there was a test to see if you're dirty or not, and if you didn't understand what I was doing, then congratulations – you're NOT dirty minded. Oh, that reminds me, go read this post about "Celibacy".

    Yes, I'm in a "fun" mood today, but these are of course serious matters, and what is really the purpose of this concept of "Gender-queer", and what on Earth is "Queer theory"? Well, I don't know that I'll actually bother to get around to answer that last question, but let me make it clear, the concept of "Gender-queer" is indeed a real thing, but before I can describe, or make you understand, what "Gender-queer" means, I need to describe what the concept of "Queer" is. See, in my post from July 22 last year, I wrote extensively about the fact that certain individuals claim that they are homosexuals and that this nowadays is recognized as a "sexual orientation" that occurs naturally. Of course, this is absolute nonsense and really hogwash; homosexuality is something that occurs when an individual of weak character is embraced too strongly by another individual, often this is the case with homosexual men, and this "embracing" really happens to go beyond the appropriate boundaries of the moral domain, and as a result a kind of mental confusion occurs where these two individuals of the same sex believe that they are "attracted" to each other, and besides, the concept of a "sexual orientation" is profoundly entrenched in individualism and this is particularly expressed in how people simply claim to have a "preference". Indeed, homosexuality is a state of mind that exists among men, sometimes women, with a weak and "confused" constitution, and this state of mind doesn't only extend to the lifestyle of "homosexualism"; there are many groups who claim that they also experience some kind of unusual "sexual orientation" and some of these people even go as far as to claim that they simply have a "fluid" "sexual orientation", which is the most extreme expression of this phenomena. Of course, most of these people claim as well, that they "discovered" this "truth" about themselves, and that they simply want to be accepted by society, a play on the humanist axiom's indiscriminate acceptance of every child, may that child be an angel or a deviant, under the banner of "tolerance". This confluence of confusion has lead to the terms Queer and LGBTQIA+: Queer being a rather abstract but also seemingly flexible descriptor for people of this character; whereas LGBTQIA+ soon will have to encompass the entire alphabet as the modern deviation continues to grow, LGBTQIA+ being an acronym for all of the aforementioned groups. Yes, Queer then, can be thought of as a kind of "umbrella concept" for all sorts of deviations and confusions that are somehow connected with the modern addiction to and claim that sexual intercourse is a "human right". So, if Queer is the concept of deviation in the sensual domain, "Gender-queer" can be thought of as similar, where this concept of "Queerness" is now extended to another distinctly modern confusion, the idea of "gender" and that a man can opt-out of being a man or a woman, conversely, can opt-out of being a woman, but I do need to add that it's not quite possible to consider "Gender-queer" an entirely different concept from just plain queer, since most of these people share similar sensual confusions, and also because most of these people could rightly be deemed perverted or at the very least mentally unstable. I do need to add that there has been such a concept as a "third gender" in many societies East as well as Western, but the Hindu concept of Hijra (हिजड़ा) is perhaps best understood as a kind of "third gender", and on a personal level I believe that a "third gender" is a good idea and that it may be this lack of a "third gender" that could explain homosexuality in men, but I have yet to develop enough thoughts to make any really informed comments in this connection, and I suppose that it would require that dastardly exercise of "psychoanalysis" to even begin to describe these matters to a modern audience, especially to the so-called "conservative" kind who so gladly prides themselves on pure ignorance and dense "reactionarism".

    All things considered on this subject, and there are surely many more things to consider, I cannot say that I am opposed to the concept of "Gender-queer", partly because there's no such thing as opposing a concept or an idea; either a concept or idea describes reality, in this case the temporal domain, satisfactory enough or they don't. As far as the concept of "Gender-queer" is concerned I believe that it may find a better place in society than the concepts of plain Queer, LGBTQIA+, or homosexuality, and indeed, there are some parts of this concept that has a connection to the primordial tradition, and I suppose that it would be quite likely that something of a kind of "third gender" might have been accepted in a primordial society such as Hyperborea. At any rate, I believe that it could be the case that a society with a ratio of too many men would be better off with an institution such as a "third gender", and really, who can blame a powerful man of the upper castes for confusing a "ladyboy" with a real woman, especially after one or two pregnancies? In fact, I believe that there are no issues with a man extending his courtship to another woman, and it's even quite possible that this courtship could be extended further, and there are many doctrinal sources, at any rate, not explicitly forbidding this, but I believe that this kind of "partnership" is more common in contemplative cultures as opposed to action oriented cultures, and this could explain why so many westerners are confused by the concept of a "third gender", instead they want to impose the confused and deviant concepts, rooted in individualism, of "sexuality" and "sexual orientation", concepts that are really modern in character.

    No, I don't believe that "Gender-queer" can be considered by a sober man to be a legitimate concept, but this concept is nonetheless closer to the source than the entirely profane and modern invention of "sexualism", and therefore I will side with more affirmation of the former as opposed to the later.

Reginald Drax – February 18, 2026.