July 31, 2025

Bhairavi Ragini (भैरवी रागिनी),
Manley Ragamala (मनले रागमाला)

Thursday:
Should sin be forgiven? | July 31, 2025

When man sins, he commits a crime against the natural and the orderly, by pushing the limits of the celestial order so far that he can be said to have fallen outside the moral universe, and as such he has committed a crime not only against the creator and the societal organism, but a crime against himself and his sacred honor. No man in his right mind would willingly commit sin and that's why all sinners suffer from the mental illness of lust, for only lust and the acceptance and open tolerance of lust can motivate man to sin against the orderly and the creator of the orderly; such men are depraved and unknowing of their crimes. This is why I hold that on a fundamental level it should be considered quite righteous to wish the sinner well, but not his sin and indeed my view is that it would be right to forgive the sinner and not not his sin, for the sinner does not know of what he is doing. However, this is a complex issue just like many other issues and on many occasions it would not be possible to forgive the sinner without forgiving and accepting the sin, and this is a situation that showcases the need to show compassion, real compassion, through wrathful means, for compassion is not the indiscriminate acceptance of all actions and all people under the sun, which is the cardinal claim of the humanist axiom, that all men are created equal, something that is an untruth. To understand the need to forgive sin, one must also understand the nature of sin, for without being able to battle, on a spiritual level, the sinner, there is no hope to move forward and there is surely no hope for the sinner. The point of forgiving the sin is not to open the door for the serpent and to allow for the transformation into the beast, but rather to object to the beast and show the world that it is possible for the far seeing man to reject sin and lust and become one with the all, but this is only possible through strict discipline and a complete rejection of the material world, and the difficulty in this enterprise is also the primordial story of the New Testament, where the messiah died on the cross for the sins of humanity, the children of God. I also need to clarify that I do not regard people that are sinners to be evil, because they do not know what they are doing, but I do regard people that promote sin as an alternative lifestyle in bad conscience to be evil, for they are enabling the propaganda and the ways of the serpent, they are cosmic agents of chaos sent to the Earth to promote man's anti-transfiguration. I also need to clarify that I am a pacifist, something I've discussed at great length, and that means that I reject any form of violence and crimes against the laws of the state, for that is not something I approve of or indeed something that would not bear any fruit; it would be quite counterproductive. It is also immoral to commit violence and to engage in the ways of the beast, something that many people refuse to understand or accept.

    What does it mean that the sin is immoral and not the person committing the sin? This is a statement that many religious people make, but they seldom go into any great detail and they equally seldom explain who they regard to be a sinner and what forgiveness means. In the era of the Kali Yuga one should expect the decay and degeneration of the moral universe and as such it becomes somewhat redundant to forgive the sinner, but from a metaphysical perspective that is the perspective of the person that exists outside of time: it is nonetheless true that the sin is a sin and a sinner is a sinner, for the moral boundaries of the universe do not and will not bend to the will of the beast and as such the destruction of the current world order has been made a given, not by the forces of the universe, but by the deviant and malign forces of the beast. I am not optimistic, is really what I am attempting to say but I do not fear, for I know that in the end the sin will be defeated. I also understand that the fanatical outlook might seem harsh by the liberal man, for he operates under the assumption that men should become liberated from themselves and the boundaries of the universe, which has rendered the righteous way inaccessible to most modern men, and this is seen in modern man's assertion of the supremacy of the human will and the human extra nature, or at least what he labels the human extra nature. The point of being wrathful is not to hurt, but for the liberal man, putting the scales of the celestial order into proper balance is viewed as oppressive and rearguard, and this is the fundamental issue for the liberal man. The sinner hurts for what he is doing is wrong and as such he deserves to hurt, but this is viewed as oppression in the modern world, but in the past this was considered quite normal and natural, and it is only since the revolutionary elite took power that sin has not only been accepted but been made the norm and indeed imposed on people. Yes, sin is being actively imposed on the populations under the rule of the revolutionary elite.

Depiction of Malkanus Raga
(मलकौंस राग)

    In the end, the person is central to the sin and cannot be separated from the sin, he does not exist apart from the sin, and instead sin should be viewed as a step towards degeneration in the diseased state of man. Any sick man would verily be forgiven for his inability, and as such it is right to forgive the sinner, but not the actions of the sinner, and to that extent it is a necessity to show wrath towards the sinner. So while the sinner should be forgiven in my view, the sin should NOT be forgiven, and again do note the distinction between the sin and the sinner, which answers the original question: sin should not be forgiven. I am however attempting to separate the sinner from the sin and I must admit that I have had a somewhat difficult time doing this so far in this post, but I hope that I have made that point clear now. I do not believe that sinners are evil, they are only motivated by evil, in most instances without knowing of the evil that is motivating them, but there are some people that are aware and them I do regard as evil, but I do not believe in extrajudicial actions against evil, for I am a proponent of radical peace. In the era of the Kali Yuga, only very few men will turn against sin, for sin is function of providence it would seem. While all men are not created equal, all men exhibit equally the same force, for all men are part of the creation and the original source, but this does not mean that all men appear equally in the material domain, which is a fundamental misunderstanding by modern men and an untruth that the serpent is using against men in the Kali Yuga. I will continue to call for all far-seeing men to embrace purity and reject sin. Celibacy is the most effective way to reject the beastly ways.

Reginald Drax – July 31, 2025.