Personal Note XIX

Yahweh in (יהוה‎):
Moses and the Burning Bush

Why is marriage under attack?
Tuesday – December 2, 2025

To begin, there are a great number of very rude and offensive people that may attack this post, and there's really nothing I can do to prevent this. Yes, these modern people are very rude and offensive indeed, but I do believe in allowing these people to show the world why they are bad people and how their ideas are bad and harmful. At the same time I do not blame these people, for they know not better, they are living under many layers of delusion, which is sad, but I have covered this topic in the past. I've also covered the topics of marriage and relationships in the past; I do not intend to cover those topics in this post again.

    To be clear, I don't actually believe in marriage: I believe that marriage is a largely modern construction in keeping with the nation-state. I believe that marriage in a lot of ways was a way to replace the old feudal system with a new arrangement that basically made men citizens and women their subjects, and I must admit that I find nothing natural or really sacred or traditional in this arrangement. I believe that marriage is completely unnatural and that there's really nothing wrong with such things as polygamy, and indeed most traditions would and have supported polygamy; it's a rather recent concept that one man should only be anchored to one woman. I also reject the western view on family: family in the traditional sense has very little to do with the idea of a core or nuclear family, and this also goes to the individualist tendencies of the western world, which really have caused great damage to most people and really set this whole moral degradation in motion. Most people in ancient times lived in small tribes and small villages, and they did not form close knit family units that excluded their community. So, while I reject the western style concept of family and marriage I still recognize that yes, there are many people who are attempting and have been successful in abolishing this unit as well, but I think that the best way of looking at this is to recognize that this is a sign of our times, the Kali Yuga and that there isn't much to be done about this; I certainly reject political so-called solutions and I will not support anyone who claims to stand for traditional values, because no such person exist, not if they are involved in the chaos of politics. Actually, I find politics to be obscene, but this is also a topic that belongs to another post.

    So, is marriage under attack and why? Yes, as I previously stated, marriage is under attack, and the main reasons stem from this liberal tendency of the proponents of the humanist axiom to project their values onto history as some kind of inevitability, which is only correct for the wrong reasons, namely again the Kali Yuga. For liberal men it would seem quite right for a man to enter into marriage with his dog, but this is because the liberals only view marriage as an economic and materialist endeavour/enterprise; for them, the liberal men, there are no sacred and moral boundaries to respect or promote for the sake of stability: only profit and materialism matters to these people. Yes, if there are any material gains to be made from the arrangement of man and dog the liberals will be sure to support it: they already support homosexual marriage on similar grounds. But the problem here is not that homosexuals shouldn't have the right to enjoy certain economic benefits: the issue, the deeper issue, is that liberals view marriage in and of itself not as a sacred union, but as a economic union so that the persons can materially benefit, and yes many disgusting and impure sexual motives exist here as well. So, most liberals don't support man and dog in a marriage, but some do for ideological reasons, but they will not promote this, not yet because there are not enough material benefits to be gained from this, and this superficial opposition to bestiality will also grant them a certain facade of "reasonableness" with the far more strident and conservative populist horde, because these people, the revolutionary elites, know that they do not have the people on their side. Yes, notice how the snake, the serpent, has to navigate this through this populist jungle.

    Also, apart from the confusions of the modern world and the Kali Yuga, I do not believe that marriage would be or is to the benefit of a man: I believe that marriage laws have been set up mostly with the woman and perhaps more so with the child in mind, but these are not sincere concerns, because these same liberal people would not promote the contemporary social order if they actually had these concerns: no, they need your money and they will hijack your wife and your kids in order get to your pocket; they will take advantage of the fact that your children are naturally vulnerable, not to protect your kids but to advance their own agenda, and in soon time the welfare state will replace you too, as their mothers become hooked on government grants.

    So to answer the initial question: marriage is under attack because the serpent recognizes that this is the most effective way to put you under the populist spell, something I've recently covered. I also encourage you to read about the most optimal ratio of females to males in any society.

Reginald Drax – December 2, 2025.