Disintegration

Meitei (ꯃꯩꯇꯩꯂꯣꯟ) depiction of
Khuman Khamba (ꯈꯨꯃꯥꯟ ꯈꯥꯝꯕꯥ꯫) and
Moirang Thoibi (ꯃꯣꯏꯔꯥꯡ ꯊꯣꯏꯕꯤ꯫)

Disintegration |
Saturday – April 4, 2026

Unbearable... The unbearable now... Really, it is all just a decent towards dissolution. Such is all there is, at least in sight of the future, but then again, do not allow yourself to forget about the remote future, the future beyond the dawn of a new day – truly the dawn of a new era. Indeed, there has been much squabble as of late about the effect that humanity pose on the climate and all sorts of other stuff that I have covered in the past, but what I have not mentioned enough is the fact that yes, the world is moving towards ultimate destruction, the Armageddon, but this should be no cause for stress and worry, as this was expected as a natural course in the movement of the cosmological cycles. This is why I do not allow myself to worry and become loaded with all sorts of agitations, because we are ascending towards disintegration, and really this is a necessary and good thing and really the world may not manifest itself differently, but most moderns would not understand this, as they believe that their "progress" is the very opposite of moving towards dissolution, and all the romanticism about the so-called unity of humanity. What kind of lie is this? Well, this is the humanist axiom, and you may not dissent, you may not dissent. This is of course why art is so important, because the natural course of the world does make itself rather obvious if you actually care to perceive it. Why is it that all things that are good, "good" used here in the correct and full sense, do not last? Is it just all a meaningless cosmic flux? Well, the world should appear this way if you only care to view the world from a corporeal and low mentality, and then the zero sum game does take over, even though the claim is quite the opposite.

    Of course, disintegration is something that most people understand, and it is perhaps one of the first things that makes humanity truly humanity, because surely every man has to be aware of his own mortality, and his own place in the universe. In the past, no man, or very few men, were truly misplaced, read "Hierarchy", and so for them disintegration was not unbearable, because these men had a clear path away from it, truly this was an integralist approach to life, not a political one. Yes, every time you move further away from the source, the creation will fade away in your conscience, or rather nothing will make sense by intuition, the third eye if you will. I suppose the Biblical story of Cane and Abel should suffice here: why was Cane so jealous, when he was the farmer? Truly, one could take here about a kind of divine vengeance, but really the revenge of Cain and Abel should suffice, and on the point made about "The Census" this should apply even more, but I will not be able to explore that connection further here as doing so is outside the scope of this post. Then what about the Heavenly Jerusalem? Well, is that not what the revolutionary elite has always promised, read "Ideological Indoctrination"? No, the remote future is not the terrestrial paradise, but indeed the celestial paradise, and if you do not understand this, then you are not skilled, and you should pursue less noise, truly a signal application of the Bodhichitta. But ascending is not about the Bodhichitta in and of itself; to ascend one must know how to fly, and in order to fly one must seek the light beyond the horizon; truly, in order to fly one must become supra-human in the order of knowledge; only this will ensure ascension away from the chaos of the unknown. When the light will penetrate and truly permeate the ground, the terrestrial domain, then shall the Kingdom of Heaven rule supreme on your heart, and at that point nothing will shake the God's Kingdom, the heavenly order. You may perhaps ask about love in this connection, and you would be quite right, but love is not unyielding, love is not indiscriminate in its acceptance – love is righteous. Why do we discriminate if we do not love? Truly, to discriminate is an act of love, an act of fundamental intercommunication, and this is the definition of love. Would hate truly induce love in the heart of the assailant? Of course not, the assailant is indifferent towards himself and his victim – this is no kind of love. So, love is the ability to receive divination, and since most humanity lack this ability it would be quite right to assert in good conscience that the transactional nature of their intercommunication has usury as their highest attainment, not love. If this is not disintegration, then away with it all! Truly, a world without love is worthy of complete and total destruction, as this is the only possibility in the substantial homogeneity of a world void of essence. So yes, the proper perspective should always be that a world lacking in essence, is a world where love has been displaced by indifference. Say what you will about the scorching heat of rage... this rage is righteous in its might and it will consume the infidel unbelievers of the hordes of Sodom; they will be destroyed, and quite rightly. Yes, what else but the word righteous could better cover the magnificence in every particle of the motion, the action, of the tiger devouring his pray? Is this not quite just? Talk about balancing the scales of the celestial order, only once you understand the power of righteous might – mighty as it is because it is righteous. This is the opposite of dissolution, disintegration, disease, degeneration, dilapidation, and decomposition – the release of righteously inspired might in fire and fury over the Earth and over the infidel hordes.

    That future, the remote future is not this place. The remote future is not this humanity, and only very and truly intelligent men may be able to prepare for the times to come; everyone else will keep pushing the edge of the horizon forward, until there is no more time, until every moment and all space has been contracted into a single point of instantaneity at the limit of the manifested world.

    Yes, talk to me about the world, about industry, about the blossoming spring to come, and about the exchange of commerce, but do not talk to me about the remote future, do not talk to me about the final moment, what the moderns call singularity – disintegration indeed.

Reginald Drax – April 4, 2026.