"Creationism"

The Nuremberg Chronicle

"Creationism" |
Monday – March 30, 2026

Creationism, as the moderns refer to ancient wisdom and true knowledge, appears to be on the "agenda" again, and as usual only for the purpose of public ridicule, and of course in the name of open and free "inquiry". Now, I will not pretend to be able in this regard, and what I mean by that is that i will not attempt to entertain the many absurd and preposterous non-claims made by the naturalists when it comes to the nature of reality, because these people are essentially driven by a kind of hate for truth itself, and their only basis for positivism is actually not something positive at all, and while I can agree that there should be no obligation to "prove" anything in the negative, I should add that most people are simply not qualified, and because most people are ignorant they simply fall outside the range or purview of true knowledge and intellectuality, and if this is a proof of any kind, it should only be taken as a proof of the profound stupidity and ignorance of modern men, read about Democracy. Of course, men of the past did possess this knowledge that I have just alluded to, but because this knowledge is firmly outside the sensible order, the most crude and corporeal conception of reality, the mentality of negation (negativism) makes rather large claims without any support. But again, I do not argue that any man should be made to prove or understand that which he quite frankly is unable to comprehend, but the inability to see beyond the immediate should, and typically did in the past, at least allow these ignorant men some kind of respect for the qualified, but this is another example of what happens when you engage in a kind of "category error": you end up misplacing the reason for, in this case the natural law. Anyways, I should really not go on about this topic, but then again I do feel a certain need to attempt to "drive the point home", but I think this will be in vain; I think this will be in vain. Then again, if everything will be in vain, then why should anyone do anything? This question is of course impossible to answer, and besides the question of predestination has been dealt with, briefly, in the past.

    But what is "creationism"? Well, there really is no such thing as creationism; creationism is essentially anything that does not coexist well or coincide with the naturalistic explanations of the world, read "Sacred Medicine" and thus is situated quite frankly outside the purview of the mass, and this is the case with all the great metaphysical traditions: essentially the concept of faith and belief has replaced ancient wisdom, and really religiosity is only considered, especially in the Western world, a kind of "preference", ad kind of individualism, that one engages in only in private. The truths expressed in the doctrines are so weak and faint that only very few men are able enough to access this world of ancient wisdom, truly the inner core of the elite, the elect (esoteric). This is why the parts and ranges of the doctrines that are most accessible to the masses and to the democratic corpus (exoteric) are most espoused today, because they are immediate and corporeal, and they are situated much further along the substantive pole of the manifestation, compared to the elite supra-intellectual of the elect. So, anything that is not accessible to the least qualified is considered impossible or not true, until the "extraordinary" has been proven. Of course, the moderns do have a point when they throw around the accusation of "extraordinary", and that is, that the lie that is "ordinary life" certainly exists well outside the range of true living, if this is what you want to call being anchored in the creation. But all of this should of course be understood as a sign of our times, a point I believe that I have made clear in the past, but a point that I do not mind continually returning to, read here. But of course, to the stupid and ignorant hordes the supra-intellectual does appear "extraordinary", and what else to them but the material would make any sense? These people are essentially living as prisoners in their own narrow and provisional conceptions. Yes, I rely on words such as stupid and ignorant because they apply in this context. How could they not apply? But understand that these people will claim that you are ignorant. The question then should perhaps become something like this: how can a man be ignorant by virtue of making claims that some other man is unable to fathom? I believe that the only correct application of that word "ignorant" would apply to that other man, that modern and hip man.

    How should you engage with naturalism then? Well, you should engage with naturalism in the way that you engage with all other demonic nonsense, and this means essentially that yes, naturalism is accessible and to that extend it applies very well to "The End of History": naturalism is essentially able to approach the limit of the sensible order, but to the extent that it needs to account for fluctuations in the cosmological environment is also deviously flexible and even more able, because it is clear that all of these theories of "scientism" are never quite good enough; this is why the concept of free inquiry is so essential to this fundamentally unbalanced talk. But "scientism" should also be understood as something that is dangerous: without the capacity to exert authority, here I am not referring to temporal power, this false authority of the sensible and democratic order will pose an overwhelming barrage of nonsense, truly a kind of noise, and if you are unable to contend with this, then you may not engage, or at least should not attempt to, engage in open discourse, because rhetoric is what matters in the course of political persuasion, another fine example of the stupidity of democracy. At any rate... At any rate... I shall not go on about this subject, as this would exhaust my finite amount of energy. I do think these points should be able to make themselves, but that would require the right reception. I doubt this last point.

Reginald Drax – March 30, 2026.