Returning?

Photograph of the Amphitheatre in Side
By M. C. Dutt

Returning?
Tuesday – August 25, 2026

Returning? Returning to the past, is it possible? If you are not interested in reading most of this post then I will deliver the short answer here: no, it is quite impossible to return to the past, and if you attempted to do this you would fail and become even more discouraged; in fact, I can only warn you against this stupid endeavour. Now, the longer answer will naturally be more long winded but it will also, at least hopefully, be much more satisfying. Well, I should admit that longer answers often are not more satisfying, except maye to the ego.

    All jokes, not that I tend to joke much, aside, there is not point in attempting a kind of "return to the past" for multiple reasons: number one, the past is in the past for a reason, read "The End of History"; number two, it would actually be undesirable for most people to live in a bygone era or period; and number three, I dislike numbering things like this, since you are used to the modern world, you would almost certainly not be long lived in a time that far away from your own. People fancy the past, and this is fine, but they cannot fathom the past, and barely, I must admit, I believe most people to be capable of understanding what moderns refer to as "in living memory", because people do really have poor memories, and there is plenty of profane science to go around to back this up, but I digress.* I should also add that it is, here form a corporeal point of view, completely impossible to travel back in time anyways, just as it would be completely impossible to make time stop; the world simply does not allow for this, and this is also in full accordance with profane science. But allow me to explain the points I made above in greater detail: the past is, as stated above, the past for a reason. We are here dealing with knowledge and the inevitable deterioration of knowledge, read "The Case For Education", and the fall of man, and so what knowledge used to be in the purview of most men is not so anymore for it cannot be so; following the cyclical nature of the world and following the rule of moving form higher principle towards lower principle, we would be prudent in concluding that it would be quite strange and, again, impossible to move from lesser knowledge to higher knowledge, read "Qualification", within the collective conscience of man that is; now, this does not mean that this cannot be achieved on smaller scale, perhaps on an supra individual scale; so again, we must conclude that the past is the past for a reason. Then it would indeed be quite undesirable for you to attempt to recreate the past, and here I believe that I can combine both of the last points that I made, because you are not suited to live in an age of higher knowledge, for you were born into this iteration of humanity, again a qualified point; and then it would be undesirable for you to attempt to recreate the past because you would suffer greatly from disease and illness, because you are so unsuited for such an environment. I think it would be true to say that you are completely unsuited for the environment of the Archean Eon, and if we can admit this, even though this was a long time ago, we should be able to admit that you would be unsuited for a time so distant that the language you speak would be unrecognizable, read "Notes on Reading". This goes beyond merely transforming you into another time from a corporeal point of view; we are here talking about a time when there was still a knowledge of the great tradition left in the world, and a time when the so-called "average person", I should add in a later post that there is no such thing as "average", was far more knowledgeable and mastefull than almost everyone alive today; we have been reduced to scrap, to trash, to rubbish, and to filth, read "Democracy". Yes, I am calling you trash because you are trash, compared to the iteration of humanity in say the Middle Ages, but do not despair this; instead accept your current state and move towards knowledge in the way that suits you the best, and only this can bring you release from your corporeal form, read "My Views on Enlightenment and Liberation".

    Now, there is a kind of romanticism in "returning" I suppose, an even I can admit that I have fallen victim to this misguided way of thinking, but again you are the one committing a grave mistake, and as usual with people who commit mistakes, they seldom care to admit this, but I do not despair in the face of creating mistakes for myself, I do not allow myself to drown in anxiety in the face of creating a mistake; instead I embrace my truth and the truth of the cosmos, and this is the only proper way of acting, of acting in accordance with divine law and divine truth, read "The Problem of Secular Law". It is also quite impossible, while I am on the subject of "returning", to return to an older self, to a self of a bygone era, because of similar though more provincial concerns. We are growing out of our potential, and then we develop along our potential, and this happens to us whether or not we like it, read "Hierarchy". I suppose part of this has to do with the idea that the past will bring relief, a fundamentally reactionary idea, and while the past was better in all regards, read "Is the Future the Enemy?". It is also true that we must allow our past to go, which means that we must allow the ego of our past to die, in order to move into the New Monday, and this is perhaps what liberates us the most, and I suppose too that this does apply to most people, but especially people of proper rank; but most people will never reach this potential in their lifetime, which is also something that prompts  them to seek a return to a status quo ante. In this regard the best course of action is to do nothing, because nothing is needed; instead of resisting, I call on you to embrace Radical Peace. This is not a manifesto, and if this is what you are looking for, then you are in the wrong place quite frankly. If you still insist on returning to someone or to somewhere, then you will have to embrace this path on your own, but I can only warn you: if you do this, then be very weary, because you will be disappointed at best and consumed at worst.

Reginald Drax (AKA, M. C. Dutt) – August 25, 2026.

Footnote(s)

* For more on this I direct you to the works of people such as Professor Elizabeth Loftus, PhD.