The Problem of Secular Law

Hindu (ॐ) Tantric (तन्त्र) Painting
Depicting deities, Brahma (ब्रह्मा), etc.

The Problem of Secular Law |
Thursday – July 9, 2026

Progressives*, so-called, claim that the only law, the only edict legitimately imposed, is that of the state, typically the democratically organized state, or simply secular law, read "The Law of The Land". Proponents of secular law assume on one hand, as I have stated elsewhere, that the universal and default position and state of mankind is that of the reasoned man simply living in continual disharmony with nature: that in nature all men are equally reasoned, read "Egalitarianism", and equally likely to arrive at the anterior position – that of secular law; and on the other hand, that all men have the same supposed "right" to subscribe—withing the boundaries of secular law—to any faith and any ideology, faith of course being used mostly as a vehicle to advance secularization further, as most people who cling onto faith have not got the slightest idea of true wisdom and of true knowledge. Of course, if you believe in the liberalism of the humanist axiom, you would be sure to approve of this and you would also be sure to approve of the talk of open discourse, but only so far... Because once a certain line has been crossed, you can no longer condone this supposed open discourse and "free exchange of ideas"; this is why you and your minions have imposed laws that restrict this supposed "freedom" of speech and freedom of the exchange of ideas, because certain ideas and certain truths are so dangerous to your position that you have been given no other choice but that of authoritarianism. You do not respect sacred laws; in fact, you consider sacred laws nothing but, at the best, relics of the past, and at the worst, instruments of "oppression", and because you are a totalizing universalist your activity must encompass all of mankind, and you will not cease your activity, your satanism and your wickedness, until you have consolidated all of the Earth and all of mankind under your rule, until you have concentrated all the temporal power in your hands and in the hands of the revolutionary elite, until you have "rescued" man from himself and from his God given fate, until you have defined the destiny of all men according to your will and according to the will of the Serpent, until you have redefined the material realm completely, and until you have found the solution to the human condition, read my "Bible Study series".

    The matter of Sacred Law as opposed to Secular Law is of course important and from a historical point of view, it was certainly the case that the law of the land was indistinguishable from sacred laws, but this was only so before the time of open schism and politics in the human arena, read "The Problem with Nationalism". Until the time of Philip IV of France, it was true that law was a matter of sacred and qualified authority and that the King was a temporary and human power ordained by God to establish order in the land, in his realm, and the issue of materialism was always solved by allowing for the sacred to reign over the material; whenever rulers of that time encountered the problems inherent in materialism, the final word, in the case of Catholic Europe, was always that of the Pontiff. Yes, problems did exist and have always existed, but in the past men did not allow disarray and chaos to rule the day; it was not considered normal for disorder to define the outlook, and whatever the future "had in store" was certainly not an issue to be debated – the future was an issue of truly qualified Astrologists, read "Qualification".

    The issue then, that I keep returning to and that most people with some kind of vision should be able to detect is that of Sacred Law vs. Secular Law: where do you draw the line, or rather how do you handle the issues that tend to come about when Sacred Law collides with the edicts of the progressives, when you are given the choice between God or deviation?

Sacred Law vs. Secular Law?

We will often encounter a situation where we must choose to either follow the law of the land, so as to not get into legal problems, or actually get into legal problems, which tends to not end well for us; the problem with Secular Law is, of course, that following the law of the land will more often than not collide with Sacred Law, and this creates an issue, a dilemma that we must somehow resolve. Sometimes though, as it happens, it can also be the case that Sacred Law and Secular law can coexist or even coincide, some examples of this could be the case of capital punishment for the most heinous crimes or the fact that the state is not yet willing to fully destroy the last remnants of the great tradition, but it must be stated that the further we get along this deviated path, the less likely this is to be the case, because recently the proponents of the material order have gotten even more radical and even more extreme in their measures to curb the will of God and laws of divinity. Resolving this dilemma is hard, especially if you reside inside the Imperial Core, but even you must find a way forward, not in the least so that you can avoid further confusion: the question then becomes what laws do you follow, should you actually be prepared to commit crimes in the name of Secular Law in order to remain clean, in order to remain righteous?

    There is a qualified and skillful manner in which you can handle this situation, and then there is an unqualified and ignorant manner in which you can handle this situation: in the former case I can guarantee success every time, provided that you are actually skillful; in the latter case I can only say that you may stumble upon success, but more likely than not you will not be able to avert the crisis of the modern day, which means that you will more likely than not find yourself in severe legal problems, depending on the situation. If you seek to resolve the aforementioned dilemma with your integrity intact, you must plan ahead and you must seek the right resources, and you must also realize that the progressives seek to establish a Kingdom of Satan, a complete and closed system, and that they will do everything in their power to keep you inside that system, and this is something that has only gotten worse and worse over time. Allow me to provide an example: say that you wish to not follow certain laws and regulations around taxation, and that it is your sincere belief that it would be immoral and against laws of divinity for you to prioritize the material upkeeping of the state and its resources over God and the Church (alternatively the Mosque, the Synagogue, or the Temple): how do you resolve this in a skillful manner? Well, the best alternative could perhaps be to simply move abroad, depending on your particular tradition this may or may not be a possibility, and if you do managed to actually move abroad to a destination where you are not forced to prioritize the state above God, then it would be prudent to conclude that you have successfully removed yourself, so far at any rate, from the claws of the progressives, and indeed I would argue that this is a skillful way to approach the problem. Another way to resolve the aforementioned dilemma would also be to simply not disclose your income to the relevant authorities, but this is a more risky approach that could easily get you into severe legal problems. You do also have the options of walking the pacific route and embracing radical peace, but this would entail losing in the short term, with the hope that you will win in the long term and more specifically in the eyes of the Lord, again depending on your particular tradition. In any case, you must tread carefully, or you will end up in problems. At the end of the day the choice is yours, but remember that it is easy to follow secular laws, but whence you have chosen that path, your hope may just be out; nothing good comes about without hardship in this world.

Reginald Drax (AKA, M. C. Dutt) – July 9, 2026.