Clarifying Statements about Men

The Woman's Land Army of America

Clarifying Statements about Men |
Monday – March 23, 2026

Because of past statements on this page, I felt, again, a strong need to clarify a couple of things regarding the metaphysical status of men. To me, it is rather clear that men are depressing and sad creatures, but this did not always used to be the case; the sad and depressing modern man is just that, a feature of modernity. Women on the other hand do not appear to be sad at all, and in fact I would advise, and I will advise, people who consider children to strongly avoid putting a son to the world. I am not a proponent of abortion under most circumstances, but there is an argument to be had in this connection: surely it would be proper to abort a fetus if there is no life to be expected out of that fetus, and besides there are no strong doctrines outside the Catholic church opposing abortions. I still do not view abortions as a good thing, but then again arguing about whether something is good or not has nothing to do with metaphysics, and really I do not wish to lower myself to the level of material moralism. If the Catholic church condemns the action of abortion, then so be it, but from my point of view there are no strong doctrinal sources even within the Catholic tradition specifically arguing against abortion. So am I in favor then, of aborting male fetuses? Well, allow me to put it this way: I would discourage the abortion of a female fetus more than a male fetus. Of course, from a profane point of view it would sometimes be rather difficult to establish the sex of the fetus, and this could be another argument against abortion all together. But what I am considering here is the sad state of men in the modern world and what the moderns call "quality of life", and it is true that indeed men do not really have a quality of life to speak of, which means that it is legitimate, only from a material point of view, to ask whether creating a life that has no hope is a good idea, but for more on this read my notes on "Antinatalism", as a further exploration of this subject falls outside the scope of this post.

    What kind of life do men really have in contemporary times? Well, first of all it is clear to me that most men lead profoundly empty lives, and most of them are expected to actually commit suicide or die much earlier than their women counterparts, and of course this profane statistic usually prompts some of these angry and hopeless men to act out against women, but this reaction against the sad state of affairs is really just that, a reaction without a midpoint, so really just noise again. Of course, another one of those profane statistics would suggest that indeed men are, on average, far less intelligent than their women counterparts, especially since most men do not graduate post-secondary education at a level even close to that of women. So could you not then just ask whether or not men overall just suck? Well, yes modern men do suck and they have only themselves to blame; every stupid and primitive man that decides to act out against women as a collective is just that, a stupid brute. In particular you may say that Western or White men suck, and this would be true. Of course, my expectation is that there will be no white men around in the future, and this sudden loss of men could potentially favorably affect the currently disastrous male to female ratio in the world, something that could, for a short time, counteract the effects of the cosmological environment. If a normal civilization such as that of Hyperborea had a ratio of 1 man per every 10 women, you would surely and hopefully understand why most men are really nothing but somewhat domesticated animals at this point. So, I would expect at most every tenth man to be a proper man, but because of the adverse effects of the cosmological environment this number could be as low as 1:1000 which would suggest that there are very few proper men out there. I also believe that it would be quite easy to prove that women only gave birth to men very seldom in the primordial past, and truly this could easily be understood today because of how early women develops breast tissue: women are basically entering womanhood much too early because of all male attention, but it should be understood that this is no real male attention as most of these males are no men. Essentially, most so-called men exist on the infra-human level, or the level below that of humanity properly so speaking. Of course, the state has a need for women to birth as many men as possible, especially since they forcibly conscript men on enormous levels in their wars. I should also clarify that these statements are not so much opinions as a matter of fact, but since I do not like to use to word fact I have decided to still refer to these statements as "opinions", but the truth is that these statements indeed are closer to the truth, but the sacred truth, read "Knowledge". Since I am unable to directly receive divine instruction I am quite frankly unable to further elaborate; either you are elected or you are not, read "Hierarchy".

    I want to make it clear that I do not intend to "offend", if I have to rely on that stupid word, in this post, but these points had to be made, I had no choice, and if you are a man then I guess you will just have to be offended. Whatever the case, I will not "moderate" my statements in order to cater to the lowest and most offensive, to use that word properly, elements of the world. These points are not made either to suggest some kind of superiority on behalf of women; I made these points to point out the simple truth that men suck and women do not, and why men suck. Again, men suck because there are quite frankly too many of them around, and this could even be acknowledged by the most cerebral person: a society with too many men is no society at all. Why do you think so many people oppose polygamy? Because quite frankly most men would be left without a woman, and so they would either embrace homosexuality, something quite common these days, or they would simply become very and overly conspicuous in their modality, often to the point that they blend in among women; indeed this is why "ladyboys" are closer to the truth than most men. This all is also why men are so insistent on being "patriots", because they believe that by offering themselves to the nation, they will be remembered as heroes; of course, this has nothing to do with heroism, but these depravities are only possible in our days, the era of the Kali Yuga, and absurdities should be expected.

    Lastly, consider why men are more corporeal: why are men more dirty and why do they not allow themselves the discipline to make order in their own house? Is it because the house has fallen to the reign of womenfolk? To me the answer is actually quite clear: men are below women, at least 999 men out of 1000.

    For more on this topic I direct you to my mini series on feminism: you may read part one here.

Reginald Drax – March 23, 2026.