The Problem of Lesbianism

Burmese (ချန်ဒီ) depiction of
the Goddess Chandi (चण्डी)

The Problem of Lesbianism |
Sunday – April 12, 2026

Political Lesbianism is a recent and understandable phenomena that must be forgiven, partly because of the state of men, something that I have covered here. Many women are embracing lesbianism because they find no reason to be attracted to men, but also because women know that attraction is not important, and really in many ways women have never been attracted to men, which means that the post political future likely will necessitate political lesbianism, because there will be no men around in the future, because men essentially belong to the past and they are already today ancient relics that are being phased out, and this is increasingly clearer and clearer for every passing day. Indeed, modern women are more intelligent and they will soon earn more money than their male counterparts. So why should modern women find modern men attractive? Well, I actually believe that most people assume that women find men attractive, but to a certain extent one has to actually understand women if one seeks to understand why they even find men attractive, because for the most part women actually do not find men attractive. I need to introduce female attraction to this post before I may continue onward: women are essentially not attracted to men, because the default for women is to not be attracted, only depraved men carry a certain libido, but because men have quite successfully conquered the corporeal domain, women have essentially never been given a choice, because there was historically no such thing as "preferences", unless the person was inspired by Satan that is. So, when people attempt to understand women they are essentially trying to superimpose some kind of male point of view on them, and this is also a sign that women are more qualified than men, at least in most regards, and once humanity moves towards dissolution, there will simply be no room left for men to play, and so men will have to disappear never to be seen again in the movement of this cycle, and upon that time, in the final days, women will only be able to reproduce using some kind of artificial method, but the counterintuitive thing about this final phase is that it will actually be less depraved than our own, but only on the surface, and this makes sense in a world void of men. So, the belief that women can be "heterosexual" or "homosexual" is deeply entrenched within a modern worldview that lacks a transcendental dimension, and really the entire concept of a homosexual or heterosexual woman must be a category error. Only men may be depraved enough to claim any kind of "sexuality", another distinctly modern concept also rooted in individualism. So no, there are no female homosexuals, but there are female lesbians, but a woman that is lesbian is not the same as a man that is homosexual, because the man that claims to be homosexual will truly be homosexual and depraved in many other ways, but the woman that is lesbian is really a woman often inhabiting a higher plane, and besides for women these things would not matter in the first place as they find no pleasure in addiction to flesh. This is why women will not be offended by being labeled lesbians, but men who are labeled, often quite rightly, homosexual will become very agitated, and really often this agitation is a sign that they actually are homosexual because such individuals tend to be more easily agitated. I can understand that a lot of people are confused by the idea that there can be such a thing as a distinction between homosexuality and lesbianism, but again homosexuality may only apply to men, and again lesbianism will become the normal state of affairs for women in the future, but I need to emphasize that this is not the remote future. If in the past men tended to be more successful, materially, than men, the inverse will soon become true and since women are quite rightly unable to find "attraction" in failed men, they will need to move away from men altogether: why do you believe men are more loud and more likely to organize themselves into vicious pressure groups such a trade unions and bikers associations? What woman in her right mind would join a motorcycle club? Well, there are of course depraved women around as well, but because of the modulated temperament of women, they are just less depraved all around, and there are many things in the world that proves this: why are women less likely to become diseased in the first place, and why, for instance, are there far fewer women of low mentality? There is a reason why women do not take on jobs that require them to destroy their own bodies, and this makes women better.

    What I should make clear now is that this post is not a diatribe against men; this post is simply an observation that will come true, and whether the target audience, in this case women, find this post offensive or not, I do not care. I also do not care if men find this post offensive. I should also add that I am not making any predictions here; whether or not all men will disappear or not in the future, I simply am not qualified to tell, but it seems quite clear to me that indeed most men simply will have no place in the future. I have also explained elsewhere, read "Gender Roles" that what appears to correlate with femininity and masculinity today have little to do with these essential qualities from a historical point of view, and that modern gender roles are just that, modern. What is really traditional in the sense women and men are supposed to behave today? I am quite unable to think of anything. No, modern men are an industrial monstrosity that is completely misplaced in the metaphysical order of things, and this is also increasingly the case with femininity but less so. If I were to describe the approximate trajectory of femininity and masculinity in a mathematical sense, it would be good to assume that feminine essence decreases logarithmically and masculine essence decreases exponentially—and yes the female function includes the natural logarithm which is the slowest increasing and decreasing number, and the male function includes the number "e", which is the fasted increasing and fastest decaying number.

    So, if you are unable to forgive lesbianism, then you are likely a part of the problem, and likely too you are one of these dense and stupid "conservatives" who are actually doing far more damage than good. Yes, you should be ashamed!

Reginald Drax – April 12, 2026.