The Hypocrisy of the Pious

The Crescent Moon (هلال)
By Ali Fekri

The Hypocrisy of the Pious |
Sunday – May 10, 2026

How dare you? How dare you invoke moral purity without adhering to the doctrines, the teachings, and the principles? Really, how dare you, read "My Views on Fundamentalism"?. Well, a lot of people do "dare" to operate in this manner and these people are false prophets and really the first politicians or at any rate the precursors to politicians and politics in general, because if you ever scrutinize politicians close up you should notice how they themselves almost never live up to all the talk they like to make. No, metaphysics is NOT about moral preaching or politics. Metaphysics is about higher principles, higher knowledge, and above all the unseen, or really those aspects of the manifestation that require proper qualification. Moral preaching is only truly about the exoteric aspects of one tradition or the other and more often than not these "exoterisms" will be quite distinct and particular, depending on the region and the people involved: for instance it would be quite preposterous to suggest that the traditional forms of Afghanistan would be so within the context of Western Europe or the new world. Besides, what we are dealing with here is politics, as I pointed out above, it its infancy and most crude state without all the talk around it so as to cloak it in a tissue of lies, yet most people seem to feel compelled to move towards action based on this alone without any proper understanding, because what is going on here is essentially the mass, the mob, leading the way as they are being manipulated by the serpents, read "Democracy".

    Yes, I have discussed this in the past but it bears repeating: there is essentially no difference between moral preaching (exoterism) and material "politicking" in the crudest and most corporeal sense, read "Ideological Indoctrination". It all to easy for the man who claims the right to throw the first stone to preach about the the faults and the supposed failures of other men, but seldom do these false prophets ever consider their own faults, their own inability, and perhaps above all their own lazy complacency, read "Homosexuality!". Also, while on the subject of homosexuality, read also "What is Sexuality?", I need to mention the particularly painful case involving a certain subgroup of very pious and adherent men—within Protestantism in particular—that openly attack and berate, in a demagogic way, other men for being supposedly "homosexual" and leading a life opposed to the teachings of the Bible, while they themselves go on in life breaking all sorts of Biblical principles themselves; and above all these men, these false prophets, tend to be very lenient—dare I say liberal or even libertarian—in the way they handle the most sacred of principles within the tradition of Christendom. Besides, since when is adhering to the doctrines supposed to revolve around the certain, or as it happens uncertain, misapprehensions of some men regarding the deviously many and flexible social mores that apply seemingly arbitrarily, depending of course on the incestuousness of temporal power with the Church? What do all of these supposed "preachers" and "teachers" actually have to offer anyone, when they themselves are completely incapable of adhering to the most basic of doctrine? All of their populist Protestantism and moral preaching have achieved nothing but further chaos, division, and decay of the now completely latent primordial tradition in the West, read "Can Western Civilization Be Restored"; truly these people represent the greatest step towards the modern and deviated world, yet they always claim to be superior in the only realm that is relevant to the modern world, the back and forth of open inquiry. Besides, to what extent would any of this piousness matter without those principles, without the doctrines; and the fact that so many men are so easily moved by this hypocrisy shows how stupid most people are today. Moral purity without principles, without doctrines represents nothing, and in that case it would make more sense to adhere to modernity, the humanist axiom, for those people at least can say that they subscribe to pseudo-principles, read "Naturalism and Its Confused Opponents".

    Also, another aspect that has to be mentioned about moral purity is the fact that many men who invoke moral purity while being completely unable and unwilling to adhere to, or even understand, principles and doctrine are also unable to adhere to the very moral purity they preach about, a true monstrosity; let it be stated that many of these men are truly Satanic for they are not moved by the light, read "What is Divine Inspiration", they are moved by darkness, their own shadow – truly they seek to impose their own dark side on humanity. This is so commonplace today that anything having to do with the exoteric (outwardly) aspects of the primordial tradition, religion, goes hand in hand with this hypocrisy, to the point where it is painful, and really it would seem that mostly fools fall for religion these days. Yes fools, because what else is there to say about the sorry state of the true traditions of the world, particularly of the Western world? I should mention that this is not to say that I am arguing against religion, even though this is a very degenerated and individualistic form of knowledge; I am arguing against false teachings and I am pointing out something that must be stated: religion is simply another aspect of politics and the people who claim that they believe in a supposed "separation" between religion and state actually tend to act in a completely opposite way, because more often than not they seek to infiltrate religion and it has now reached the point where religion has become almost completely secularized, completely solidified. Besides all of this, who can truly claim to even be a believer these days? As if the degeneration of the sacred doctrines had not gone on far enough, most supposedly pious men are not even truly believers, for their piousness is only a facade or a "lifestyle", really a "preference", and the moment they feel the need to throw away their piousness, almost exclusively in the face of the slightest hardship, they do this without the slightest contemplation, almost as if they never truly believed. Then again, adhering to principles has nothing to do with "belief". If these false prophets and false preachers truly believed, if we allow ourselves to entertain this for a moment, why would they so selectively and indeed strategically choose their target of outrage, for their only motivation seems, at times, to be devil worship – truly this is politics in its crudest sense. Do not allow these people to lead you astray; do not let these people confuse you!

Reginald Drax – May 10, 2026.