Further thoughts about "Bots" – freestyle

Bot by Theo

Further thoughts about "Bots" |
Monday – February 16, 2026

If you're interested in reading about "Bots", I've linked my first post on this subject under the heading.

    There's been much talk about bots and artificial intelligence (AI) lately, and while I do not know too much about these things, since I tend to stay rather aloof about "popular culture", I do believe that most people seem to take a negative view of bots and AI. Yes, it' true that this page appears to have received a lot of bot-related traffic, but at the same time I cannot say that I mind this. See, there's been as well much talk about "progress", but in this regard most people seem to just not view bots as a kind of progress, and this is rather baffling to me, but then I am reminded of history and the character of most modern men. See, most modern men do not like the idea of some kind of disruption to the status-quo, since they've been instructed by their education system to accept all the mores and rituals of modern society, which means that even if technological advancements are pushing the limits of the temporal domain—something that I am covering in more detail in my "Future series", thank you very much for reading it—but since these technological advancements threaten to disrupt the material comfort that most modern men have gotten used to, they actually turn against this "progress", and as a result you end up in a situation where most people are against the prevailing winds of the times, yet in the end most people simply allow themselves to be inoculated just enough to get used to this change, this is also something you may read about in my post labeled "The end of history". See, even though movements such as the "labor movement" in the end cannot win, modern men seem very capable of living in the delusion that they actually matter, or rather that their ideas somehow matter. Of course, the recent advent of "AI girlfriends" cannot be understood as anything short of both a metaphysical and moral outrage, really a monstrosity of existential magnitude, yet this is not the reason most moderns turn against this development; most modern women turn against this development because of the alluring lies offered by feminism, and most modern men turn against this development because they will that they as men serve no purpose on the modern world. Of course, men do not serve any real purpose in the modern world, but that's an issue that I have partly covered here and would simply be too extensive to cover in this post, since that topic is entirely outside the scope of this post. Verily, people do oppose much of rapid change that is taking place in the temporal domain, but they are merely opposing this change out of spite and pure selfishness, another tendency in keeping with the rampant individualism of our times, particularly among the youth. Will people get used to this change? Of course they will, and it is only to expect that bots and AIs will replace human functions in this, our era, of the Kali Yuga.

    But enough about the Kali Yuga and other metaphysical matters that you may read more about under the label "Religion & Metaphysics". Would it not be prudent to learn about the emergence of a new world, the post-humanist paradigm? Yes it would be, and in fact I believe that it is quite necessary to understand this inevitability if one actually seeks to depart the temporal domain entirely, something you may read about here. See, from the point of view of modern civilization, of course these technological developments should be considered a form of progress, and to even get to this point, once must reject all notions of the humanist axiom, so that one may approach the world from above, which is a first step towards real knowledge and profound insight. Most people in the modern world cannot grasp the real world, and this is because they exist on the level below humanity, really most modern people are living like animals, and this has made them unable to ever see beyond the immediate, the physical, and consequently they cannot even come to appreciate the fruits of the materialist order, instead taking them for granted and opposing them at every step until they've forced the production of new quantities that suit their needs, this is really a mob rule of sorts and something that is very much characteristic of the so-called "free market" model. Can anyone really say in modern times that they are happy with all of these material "advancements"? Hardly, because people lack skillful means and this makes them lazy, something that should be understood as a feature of the system and not a bug.

    I know that I've been all over the place so far in this post and it may seem a little bit unclear where I'm going here, but do bear with me. See, I am not against bots or AIs per say; I am against what humanity does with these tools, and I am against the modern deviation and the inability to ever see beyond the immediate. It's not that AIs or bots are problems, but rather the people are the problem for we're living in a world that is ruled by people that fundamentally lacks substance, and if this was a traditional society and these material "advancements" happened to be made in such a society, I would be all in favor of it, but the issue is the lack of knowledge and the loss of primordial wisdom. In that regard I must also admit that I would quite prefer talking away with robots, because they are doing what they are designed for; the bot and the AI is right in tune with their domain, but this cannot be said about the grotesque and revolting character of modern men. Can the bot be at fault for simply executing instructions? No, just as an animal cannot be at fault for simply reacting to his environment, and it is this level, the level of animals, where modern men exist, and this makes renders them an alien species, really an intruder in nature, an anti-organism, to rely on that "naturalistic" term. Pride yourself on your ability to act and I will surely be glad to help you along, but do not consider yourself the master of the world or the master of any domain, when you continually find yourself unable to break even the most mundane routine, designed to maximize "effectivity", you are told, but really designed to maximize your own immediate pleasures and inability to adhere to your rightful place within the metaphysical order of things; this thing that you call "acting" is nothing but following the orders you've been assigned by someone just like yourself, manifestly unable and incapable. How can this modern so-called "civilization" be considered anything other than a true monstrosity? At least I don't expect anything else from something that has been designed for this expressly "materialistic" purpose. Yea, go on you modern deviant, complain all you want about bots and AIs, but know that all your complaints will remain void of any real substance – as long as you remain so determinedly aloof of your own place within the universe. Dastardly bastard of Democracy you truly are, but you will be sure to blame your metaphysical crisis on the most recent advent, as if history has no name and no place. Shame on you, you modern debutante, for you are only the latest and most advanced form of the beast, the latest version rolling out on the conveyor belt; tragic as though this is, at least your aloofness blinds you to the cannibal that you are, an empty vessel whose only purpose is to consume your own replacement by the completeness of the triumph of the material order.

Reginald Drax – February 16, 2026.