Rural Life – freestyle

A late 18th century painting of
Saptarishi (सप्तर्षि) and Manu (मनु)

Rural Life |
Wednesday – March 18, 2026

Rural life seems almost forgotten here in the 21st century, but that is not entirely true of course, especially not outside the industrialized nations, primarily of the West. But it is true that much of the sacred ways of rural life have been forgotten, even in communities far outside the modern world, and here I am referring to some "native" populations as well. Of course, from a natural point of view, or a "normal" if you will, rural living is far more humane, I am not referring to humanism here, in that human beings tend to be more in tune with life and nature when they lead a more rural life, but it should also be noted that rural life in the modern sense is also very much out of tune with the predilections of humanity, and this is why mental illness and other deviations are expressed more commonly in modern times and particularly in urban areas but also, to a lesser extend, in the "countryside", as rural life in the modern sense is still better than purely urban living.

    There are, of course, many reasons why it should be expected that most humans function better in a rural setting, but I believe that there are a couple of important reasons for this: in most rural areas, even in modern times, there is, for the most part, no such thing as "multiculturalism" and overcrowding, and truly most people are known by society, and in such circumstances you may speak of a kind of true society, where the circle of concern, if you will, extends no further than to a couple of hundred people at most, and where such things as identity are anchored within the natural order, a truly organic society, and I should also point out that there are many profane scientists who claim to have been able to ascertain that the human memory can deal with at most about 150 to 200 people, a material explanation for something that most people with some intellect should be able to sense, read "Knowledge"; then there is the corporeal aspect in the most physical and profane meaning of the word, because the fact is that it is very unnatural for a man to constantly be surrounded by strangers—this point goes to the first but it is nonetheless important—and also having to compete over limited space with these same strangers, and I believe that it would be quite right to say that this state of affairs is completely intolerable and quite totalitarian, which happens to be one important aspect of why the revolutionary elite insists upon emptying the "countryside" of people and replacing them with machines, read "Agenda 2030". It should also be added that rural life is in keeping with the humane because such living is profoundly giving, as each man has to learn how to work the land and learn how to become in tune with himself and the universe, and this made most men, peasants, true masters of their vocation, something also forgotten. Then of course, I should mention the fact that rural life is less stressful, or truly less aggressive in the senses, and a mind without disruption and interruption by continual noise, is a truly healthy mind without possession; a mind without possession does not lend itself to addiction and other depravities of modern ignorance. Of course, it is also true that rural life, this is in connection to addiction, makes the body healthy as well, which should be something quite expected from a healthier mind; there are few fat people that truly can claim to lead a "rural life".

    There are, as I previously mentioned, many powerful interests that seek to keep as many people away from rural living as possible, and these interests consists of a industrial mafia if you will, and this mafia is expressed in how politicians and other influential people write laws etc, but among these interests you will find large agrarian, so-called, corporations that seek to buy up as much land as possible, and these have been the main drive of people away from the "countryside" and into the cities, but then there are also many other interests such as banks distorting the economy in a way that largely caters to urban living, which has made it more and more difficult for people to continue to live a somewhat rural life. Agenda 2030, as I also previously mentioned, appears to make it clear that no-one should be living on the "countryside" by 2030, but this goal is of course impossible, but these people, the revolutionary elite, are relentless in their work to enslave the masses to the material order, and they will not cease to push and push until they are successful. On top of all this there are also major concerns about "Climate Change" and the uniform answer is as usual: quantify and materialize more and more of the world, which is in keeping with the abolition of the "countryside", and effectively this all means that the vast majority of humanity will become enslaved during this century, and very likely, I make no predictions here, the end stage of our era, the Kali Yuga, may just be at hand in the not so remote future, but again it is be too early to call; one thing is clear though, humanity is spiraling towards global catastrophe. If compartmentalization and individuation are the default mode of being in our times, what would life at the subhuman stage appear as? Well, if you are bewildered by the current rate of subhuman rectification, then you should may not be astonished in the expectation that what today is considered home, which usually only applies to the space where someone dwells, likely will shrink and approach the ontological limit of what could be considered home: if home, for most of human history, used to refer to the tribe, the village, or the community at large, home today refers merely to the "living" space/quarter, and in the future this is likely to refer only to the individual alone, which means that each individual will truly be lost in the wilderness at all times, out of reach so to speak, and a man that is out of reach is a dangerous man in these times without history.

    Of course, all of what I am writing is truly monstrous, but such is the character of modernity, or really the modern deviation. At the moment, maybe you can live in the "countryside", using colloquial American English, but the reason why you are struggling in the city is quite clear, if you are willing and capable of seeing the world for what it is. I can only encourage you to not allow yourself to become a monster. Also, as I stated earlier: living in the "countryside" will not enable you to disconnect from the modern world, but life in the "countryside" is a step in the righteous direction, away from the deviation.

Reginald Drax – March 18, 2026.