The Son You Never Had

The Rage of Achilles (Ἀχιλλεύς),
fresco by Giovanni Battista Tiepolo

The Son You Never Had |
Monday – June 1, 2026

Bullies... Bullies indeed... But why bullies? Because I say so! No, not because I say so, but because the revolutionary elite says so, read "Politics". You see, you may or may not have a son, that is completely besides the point, but the son that you deserved is not to be, for he can only exist in another iteration, during another cycle, and whatever your son is during this iteration is nothing short of a catastrophe, but this is not the fault of your son; this is just another sign of our times.

    See, men today, read "Masculinity", are not really men in the metaphysical sense of being a man, but I should of course qualify the difference between masculinity and men before I go one, read also "Gender Roles": the circumstance that men coexist with masculinity is one of cosmological imperative during most cycles, but in the present cycle, it is clear that there has been a rupture or disconnect of sorts between masculinity and men, and really modern men are no longer masculine, nor are modern women feminine, read "Femininity > Masculinity?". Truly, what has been lost is something quite tragic and really it should conjure up all sorts of melancholic affection in anyone actually considering the old world, the lost world, because still can men sense what has been lost and therefore grieve this loss, and this loss really represents a kind of barrier between our world and the old world, for the old world feels close yet never close enough for it to be experienced by any man alive today. Of course, this sense of closeness is rapidly coming to an end, read "The End of History", which is why I sense a certain urgency in relaying this message. Also, it is perfectly good and legitimate to grief, but on the other hand it is also perfectly good and legitimate to seek within this tragedy the light, the light at the end of the tunnel, and indeed such a light can be detected by some very few men, and those men should be allowed to represent the archetype of the son that you never had, of the son of yours across the limit, across the divide between the old world and our world. Indeed, this is a tragedy, but within this process of decay there will come reinvigoration, read "Destruction!", but this will only happen in the remote future, once you have crossed the limit of the world, and until that time you will need to process the death, the symbolical death, of the son that you never had.

    Of course, what I am referring to here is something quite ancient in motif, but it seems to me that most moderns have forgotten about this here at "the end of history", and really I must admit that the cowardice of these people is what is the most striking and the most telling. It is obvious that the world at present exists in a state of continual agitation, read "What is Capitalism?", and you may think of this agitation—continual though it is as mentioned above—as a kind of anti-transfiguration similar to the one that occurs when the body is transformed away from perfection, read "The Primordial Body", towards disease and imperfection, and here one could surely accept the view of that fat bastard, that monster, becoming the new man, the political and "enlightened" man, truly an object. So, if the son that you never had was excellent in form and feature, you must now realize that he was taken away from you before you ever had a chance to resist; not only was he murdered (symbolically) but his memory has almost been completely erased, read "Agenda 2030", and this memory is barely left within your own body. Truly, is this not the point at which solidification has reached its ontological limit? Almost, and humanity is quickly approaching this limit, read "Disintegration", and this means that whether out not you decide to create a family will matter more than ever before, and this is felt in the statistics that modern men love to cling onto, in order to understand and make sense of the world: the fact is that fewer and fewer people are even considering creating a family, and for good reasons, because what you can expect, read "Should You Disown Your Children?", are children that will become solidified, at least this is very likely to happen, and again remember that time is currently accelerating towards the eventual cataclysm, read "The Eschatology of the Kali Yuga". Also, the agenda was always to create displacement, a kind of displacement of the sacred, and this is why they came after your son; of course, indirectly they did come after your daughter as well, read "Why do Young Women Like Cameras?", because an object can only be displaced by another body, at least according to the laws of profane science. I should add that this is not a "conspiracy" against you, because there is no organization behind these efforts; instead these efforts must be understood from the point of view of the cyclical period in which we are living under, read "My Views on The Reign of Quantity", and currently all of these diseases and confusions are converging towards that eventual moment, that singular moment, in time, right before the dawn of the new era, read "Essentials for the Golden Age".

    All this is not to say that you should not create a family, but it is to say that whatever hope you may have for the future, you are surely better off placing it in the remote future, read "Cynicism". Also, what we are dealing with here is all about potential, but if you know that there is no potential, would it then not make sense to not take the bet? At least this is what you are presented with today, because children are only seen as "potential". Of course, this is another monstrous inversion of the metaphysical order of things because while it is true that children are pure potential, this cannot possibly be the case under the present circumstances, and besides potential, read "Qualification", is treated as something one becomes, instead of what it is, something that one has inherent within, truly a quality that has to be cultivated, and while this may seem like identical propositions, this is not so: consider the difference between a flower that has been cultivated and a flower that has been grown according to the laws of mechanism, an industrial flower, truly a counterfeit. Is this counterfeit equivalent to the true and the pure? Of course not, but they, the revolutionary elite, do not want you to notice the difference, read "Divine Inspiration", instead they want you to become numb to all the noise. Can you notice the difference between the son you never had and the counterfeit standing in front of you?

Reginald Drax (AKA, M. C. Dutt) – June 1, 2026.