Personal Note XLIX

Yahweh in (יהוה‎):
Moses and the Burning Bush

Smoking |
Wednesday – July 8, 2026

Smoking is a subject that I keep returning to, and if you wish to read all about it on this blog, click on this link. You see, for me smoking represents something rather full. Modern life is not that full, not even when we consider the material monstrosity of this civilization. So, what can a man do to rest his case at the end of the day? Is he supposed to just sit down and allow it all to sink in? Yes and preferably so, but you see, most men are not capable of this feat and so they need to smoke, drink alcohol, or take heroin; there seems to be no way around this little inconvenient fact – addiction. Of all addictions in the world, which one is the least bad? I would say smoking, because alcohol will destroy the liver and heroin will, for the most part, be illegal, and so most men, if they actually apply some skills in their approach to life, are left with having to smoke, they have very little to no choice, often at the end of a long day, but sometimes even in the middle of the rush, as smoking can provide a urgent relief during high pressures. Yes, I can recommend anyone to smoke during the day, because I believe that smoking cigarettes in particular will help extend your life, as they act to bring down your blood pressure and your sense of urgency, read "Stress!".

    How can any man truly live with any peace of mind in the commotion of the modern world? Nay! The modern world makes us sick, because the modern world is specifically designed with your demise in view. Think about it: you believe that you are nothing but a happenstance, a particle floating in time without aim and without meaning; why should you care about death? Is death not always around the corner? This kind of sickly and deviated, nihilistic, and depraved mentality is what passes for good living these days, as if living was a goal in and of itself, but these people, these mentally depraved demons from the pit, do really believe this, and they even go as far as to romanticize their own demise. Is it not then curious that they should have come to have cared so much, so much, about being "healthy"? Well, they do not actually care about their health, since they do not know anything about health, read "Sacred Medicine", but what they do care about is their own status or, more to the point, their own identity, because after all, a good man is a man with a decent respect for boundaries, and this certainty applies to health, whether or not you actually acknowledge this, read "The Problem of Borders", but their perception of boundaries is not accurate; for them, the moderns, it would be perfectly alright and "normal" to pretend that athleticism is somehow good for your overall health, while at the same time none, at least almost none, of them would ever admit that their current diseased and wicked lifestyle is very much contributing in adverse ways to their future demise. I suppose as well, that more than a certain element of nihilism that there exists, as alluded to above, a strong element of romanticism here, another recent development, because without God and without sacred arbitration, if you will, nobody really knows, read "Knowledge", what health actually is. Besides, health does not matter, and if anything is material, it has to be the current and intensifying obsession about health, and notice how the profane scientists never actually seem to be able to pinpoint anything in particular: at first they claimed that smoking was not bad for your health and that indeed smoking was beneficial, but then they turned and now we are supposed to believe that smoking causes cancer? What about leading a lifestyle, one of these "alternative lifestyles", that brings you down to the level of the beast? Is this good for your health? Of course it is, and in fact they, the World Health Organization (WHO) among others, claim that if you do not live out your sorted life, if you do not embrace and become one with your anxiety, that this will hurt you.

    Do you listen? Do you hear these people? There is no such thing as health, and even less so today, for health cannot be possible; only the primordial body can truly be healthy, read as well Genesis 3:19. If you actually want to stay healthy, then you must ultimately depart from this world. Yes, when I was in the world I did also wonder about health, but today none of this matters, for I know now that I possess knowledge of and can bear witness to the source – the one and only. But allow me to submit this piece of evidence, if you are still in doubt: in this report the WHO declares that the Tobacco Industry

"[engaged in] decades of deception and duplicity"

and that the

"Tobacco companies 'have marketed and sold their lethal product with zeal, with deception, with a single-minded focus on their financial success, and without regard for the human tragedy or social costs that success exacted'" — Judge Gladys Kessler, United States District Court, 2006 

That is all well and true, but why should we only concern ourselves with the practices of one industry over all the other industries, monstrous and devilish as they all are by definition? What is it exactly that the WHO is attempting to say here? Now, consider this, as well from the WHO:

"In some settings, criminalization of consensual adult same-sex behaviour, as well as stigma, discrimination and violence against MSM [men who have sex with men], have created an environment that compromises people’s human rights and makes them less likely to access health services for HIV, viral hepatitis, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) [also known as venereal diseases] and other essential services."

and

"WHO also supports partners to address structural barriers such as criminalization, stigma and discrimination."

First of all, why all the hogwash about human rights and "structural barriers"? I will return to this first question later on. Is homosexuality a driver or not in the spread of venereal disease, and are the practices of these people not also "without regard for the human tragedy" and for the "social costs" involved here? It just seems rather curious to me that these people, these so-called "experts", are more than happy to spread the word about the supposed evils of the tobacco industry, yet you will not hear a single word, not one, about the evils of modern living, the evils of decadence and how this is driving the fall of man, really how this is the very cause of most disease, read "Global Warming!". Is it perhaps the case that so-called "structural barriers", or really discrimination, is a good thing, something that can actually prevent the spread of disease? Ever heard of disease control? But according to the WHO this is not the case and if you try to protect yourself from venereal diseases you are "stigmatizing" the chief spreaders of these diseases.

    So, how does this square with smoking? Well you see, when it comes to smoking the supposition, and the assertion, is that smoking causes disease and that therefore you must be better off by discriminating against everything and everyone involved in smoking, but as soon as the focus turns away from smoking to sexual intercourse, something that most moderns appear to be obsessed with, all of a sudden we must take "human rights" into consideration and the same quick sorted gesture that was just alluded to above is out of the question. The question that remains to be asked then is this: is it a human right to spread venereal diseases—something that indeed is very easily preventable, even with the help of profane science—and in that case why should not the same standard apply to smoking? Because we have already left the realm of promoting health and the question about what impact smoking has on your health is at this point wholly irrelevant. Again, I leave the question above to be answered by the WHO, not that I expect them to ever engage in an honest and open dialogue.

Reginald Drax (M. C. Dutt) – July 8, 2026.