Polygamy as an Alternative to Divorce

Musa (موسى ابن عمران) winning his
battle against the Pharao's magicians

Polygamy as an Alternative to Divorce |
Wednesday – March 11, 2026

Divorce is another one of those modern catastrophes, a "convention" or perhaps a "style" without any sanction from spiritual authority, another "right" that has been claimed or demanded by the people least capable of receiving divine instruction. Of course, just as well in a democracy I guess and  in keeping with the individualist attitude of the moderns: why should marriage be considered sacred when everything else is now deemed "secularized" and quantifiable to the nth degree? After all, should not the particular and momentary "preference" of the individual rule supreme, above the natural order, which is a prerequisite for this deviation in the first place? Of course, divorce is a matter of "freedom" and individual determination, and in the end there's no such thing as a sacred unity, at least not according to the moderns, who know nothing about anything but the most corporeal and immediately available. But even for the modern deviation, the profane concept of divorce is a fairly recent development, and as late as only a couple of decades ago, the Catholic Church in the Western world opposed such a thing, since there are no sources in the doctrines or in the scriptures extending to the Church any such ability or power to "annul" the marriage, but this latest modern confusion is just another expression of individualism, and when the focus is concentrated more and more on the narrowly singular in life, such in the case with individualism, the concept of marriage goes hand in hand with the concept of divorce, almost as if divorce has become an expectation in marriage, and that the sacred unity of marriage is to be discarded at any moment, because marriage in the profane and legal sense has nothing to do with the concept of marriage in the great primordial tradition. At the end of the day, most people "divorce" each other because they simply believe themselves to have such a right, and of course they do, at least under the material order, and in this material world the concepts of modernity have replaces all sense anchored in the orderly that it would seem quite impossible for moderns to be able to conceive of a world without instant gratification, and so once the addiction has grown, once the material mentality has been allowed to uproot the primordial, divorce becomes inevitable. Of course, most moderns claim that they have "outgrown" or "evolved away" from their spouse and that they "need" to divorce their spouse in order to become free enough to explore "new horizons" and to heal from "trauma", and more often that not women make these claims, as they are also more likely, according to statistics, to divorce and therefore ruin the marriage. Apart from high divorce rates, marriage itself, in the legal sense, have become less and less common over time; here is a chart:

    The best way to interpret this is of course that people are too busy and too involved with the immediate and the corporeal aspects of life and indeed of the sensual arts, and this is of course a kind of addiction in itself, and when men live merely for immediate satisfaction it becomes quite natural for them to grow tired of their wife, especially within the narrowly oppressing confines of "monogamous", but this seems more common for men of ascendant rank, as they are the only ones truly capable of commanding authority within a polygamous marriage. What we are dealing with here is an essentially modern phenomena: the man grows tired of his wife because the material order tells him to only value the corporeal aspects of his wife, and as his wife grows older and more tired and probably less physically alluring as well as more fat, and the result is that he loses interest in his wife and starts to see within other women what he once saw within his wife. Similar problems to this did exist in the ancient world, but men did not grow tired of their wives simply because of the material limitations on sensuality that are imposed today, but because it was considered natural for a man who could command authority to betroth and marry another woman and to further his own kind by both lateral and horizontal propagation; of course, today only a very bastardized version of lateral propagation is allowed, and truly in most modern marriages the man is the person without authority, a source of yet more confusion and upheaval, and often more so for women than for men. Simply put: polygamy was a natural course in any marriage, and more often than not the wife would encourage her husband to marry other women, because this reinvigoration also protected the wife and other women from her husbands depraved nature, as most men without women fall victim to the demonic and the satanic, something quite aggressively expressed in the depravities of homosexual "subcultures", where the last remnants of the moral boundaries have been annihilated, quite literally. Indeed, how can men be moral without marriage, without a proper place within the societal organization? No such creature exists, thus modern so-called men cannot be said to be men – modern men are beasts below anything worthy of the human conception.

    In the modern context, this deviation, this dysfunction, has granted women power and erased the authority of men, and while this has created much confusion for men, it is the case that women more so has suffered from this chaos, and truly no modern woman can be said to be happy within their marriages, because indeed, modern women are constantly having to keep up with the rapid changes of "preference" and individualistic atomization. If modern women would allow the postulates of feminism out of their minds, I believe that many of them would find the prospect of polygamy (in this case polygyny) quite satisfying, as this would be the natural thing to do, although it must be stated that for the most part this is reserved for men of ascendant rank, and this would surely make women more happy as they would grow into the role of mother, and it would also potentially—here I am speculating in purely profane sciences—improve the societal organization by allowing men of ascendant rank to propagate to a larger extent, compared to men closer to the beastly form, which could, only in the short term, temporarily halt some of the accelerating forces of decline; also, this would encourage men of generally low mentality and low ability to embrace celibacy, something that could earn them true discipline. It should be noted that I am referring to polygamy from a strictly material point of view here, and truly this last postulation of mine could be considered a form of politics, something that I generally avoid. Since I mentioned politics it would be fitting then for me to propose this: I suggest that politicians legalize polygamy (specifically polygyny) and encourage women to marry men of higher aptitudes, as this would also, temporarily, solve the evermore salient concern around birth rates and out of control immigration, especially in the Western context but also very much so in the Far East.

    Profound and irreversible disruptions will likely occur in these societies regardless, but this could potentially halt the rate of disruption, for some time at any rate. Since this is merely a political suggestion within the corporeal context, I have decided to not propose the abolition of divorce, as this would encourage a tremendous uproar that likely would further accelerate degeneration. Pity the ignorant masses for such is the fate of Democracy: the rule of the least capable usurped by the loudest and most offensive elements of society, the revolutionary elite, the so-called "intelligentsia", all constantly prepared to act – to smash the sacred in the name of "progress".

Reginald Drax – March 11, 2026.