The Future of the Internet

Radio Communications Tower by
Julian

The Future of the Internet |
Monday – June 8, 2026

The Internet as most people know it today is changing, and with growing government scrutiny, regulations, and interference, the internet of open discourse and free movement, free movement in a figurative sense – is over and will stay over. I guess some people may say here at the end of the early internet that they had a blast; I sure did. I should also preface this post by clarifying that this may be a different post from many of my other posts, and since this post belongs to my "Future series", I recommend that you also read more of those posts if you find this post interesting.

    Yes, "the early internet", if you will, is coming to its end, and for the most part there is about nothing you and/or I can do about it, because governments around the world, read "Temporal Power", have decided that they will insert themselves on the internet too. Yes, it is the case already that governments very much regulate the internet, and no government will ever allow itself to lose any grip of its power, but until this point most governments, at least in the Western world, have pretended that they believed in some kind of open and free internet, but no longer and really I cannot predict exactly when things will change for the worse, well they have already, but it seems that this process of destroying the internet is getting worse and worse by the day, read for instance "Chat Control!". I should also clarify that indeed this is not the early internet in the sense that the internet was just (recently depending on your perspective of course) invented and really the internet has actually been around in one form or another since the mid to late 1960's, but it is the case that up until about now, most governments have allowed people to develop the internet in whatever way suited them, and really it was also the case that internet ran parallel to most societal functions, but in the last decade or so the interconnection of society and the internet has intensified, and with this integration the government has inevitably inserted itself or rather the government has been granted more and more excuses to insert itself. Notice always this theme with any government, may it be a democratic regime or a despotic regime: governments will always claim absolute sovereignty and therefore absolute authority in any land, read "The Law Of The Land", and this means that there is really nothing that stops them (governments) from inventing more and more reasons to intervene in the life or supposedly "ordinary men", because if you are an "ordinary man", know that you are not the subject of God, you are the subject of governments; you are another brick in the wall, another interchangeable unit, another soldier ready to "die for your country"... What a joke and really, what a crime. Indeed, what a crime that these people, read "Politicians", should be allowed to claim that they stand above God, read "Is God Above the Law?"; that their secular and crude law stands above the heavenly, but this is the sorry state of affairs that we find ourselves in and it is now starting to affect the internet.

    I have always been a proponent of the internet, because it allows people to get away from the propaganda and the lies, the ideological indoctrination, because the good thing about open discourse, read "What About the Noise?", is that it can overwhelm the particular narrative going on at the moment, and you see, because hyper-modern propaganda is getting fairly sophisticated the internet can and has been used to actually overload the informational landscape with noise and lies, something that means that the revolutionary elite has actually lost control over their own lies, somewhat at least and increasingly so, and therefore of the narrative; and really from my point of view this loss of control is the beginning of the disintegration. Of course, these people (the same revolutionary elite is being referred to here) will not let up that easily, and since they are starting to get more and more ideas of how to steer propaganda in one direction or another, although hyper-modern propaganda is not so much about direction as it is about results, they want to choke whatever "freedom" exits today on the internet but still somehow maintain the illusion of freedom online, and this is why they make sure to not be too aggressive about it. Something similar happened to the car about a century ago, and there are even some extremists that claim that people should be required to obtain a kind of drivers licences in order to "operate the internet", read "The Police", which seems somewhat laughable at the moment, but this could very well become reality, especially if the revolutionary elite becomes cornered, something that will make them more and more agitated and desperate. Notice that power—crude and raw, truly offensive power—never let up unless someone makes them; this is truly the story of humanity during this our era of the Kali Yuga, one revolution after another, destruction begets destruction for one material end after the other, and somehow modern people consider this freedom and "progress". I can say this though, in this regard: it is surely that case that it would require a revolution, yes a violent revolution, for governments to change their minds; really what is required here is that each and every government is overthrown, removed entirely, from power, but in lieu of this only time can come to the rescue, because there is a lot of talk these days about "being on the right side of history" which is a very peculiar concept indeed, read "The End of History", but what these people are saying is essentially that they do not need God, and their counterfeit of justice or replacement of God is this vague and impossible—on purpose—notion of "the right side of history".

    Armed with "progress" and political language about the need to "protect", because apparently people are too stupid to protect themselves, politicians will destroy the internet as they have already destroyed everything else. I will say this though: apart from governments, understand that there are many large corporations involved in this adverse development that are looking to earn money on this, because what they wish to turn the internet into is a closed system where "ordinary people" have no choice but to rely on their "services", and this is especially the case with devices that people have less and less control over. Today you may be able to "own" many of your material belongings, but in the future you will truly own nothing as the concept of private property is being increasingly destroyed, read "Agenda 2030", and people will grow used to this, as they always do. Truly, this is a kind of "zombification" happening in real time. So no, apropos "Is There Hope?", there is no hope for the internet or humanity in its current iteration, and now we must live through the latest deterritorialization, the disintegration of the internet and of the concept of objective material truth itself. If until this point modern men rejected the supra-individual order, they still had some sense of the objective and material truth, this is now definitely over.

Reginald Drax (AKA, M. C. Dutt) – June 8, 2026.