The Problem of Raising Boys
![]() |
| Tibetan (卐) Prajñāpāramitā Illustration (་ཤེས་རབ་ཀྱི་ཕ་རོལ་ཏུ་ཕྱིན་པ་)(प्रज्ञापारमिता) |
The Problem of Raising Boys |
Tuesday – July 21, 2026
For some time it has been fancy to consider an abortion if the fetus turned out to be female, especially in the Far East, but this practice has really been to the detriment of those societies and perhaps more so to the economy of those societies, especially if we only concern ourselves with the largesse of the purse, or the not so largesse of the purse, really if we only concern ourselves with materialism, do also read "What Should the Ratio of Men to Women Be?". But I should add that even profane scientists have finally reached the conclusion that it would be stupid to abort female fetuses, regardless of the matter of doctrine, or rather if doctrine is involved in the decision or not, which it would do good to presume that it would not be, in most cases that is, although there are certainly cases where doctrine must be separated, such in the case of the Bible and the decree of the Pontiff (Papal Bull) if we only consider this matter from the point of view of western men, read "Can Western Civilization Be Restored?".*
The problem to consider here though, and especially for the civilizations of the Far East, is what this does to their societies: how much has Chinese civilization been disrupted over the past half-century and changed due to the determination on behalf of the Bolsheviks in charge of that country? See, it may have been one thing for Mao Tse Tung (毛澤東) to consider completely changing the physical landscape of that country in favor of industry and of the industrial man, the masses, when he sought to force every man in that land to swear allegiance to him and his faux-nation in communism and the brotherhood of the hedonist cult, but it is indeed and it was indeed an entirely different crime to extol the masses above the divine mandate, the mandate of heaven, to such an extent that they (the Chinese) and the world have to live with the profound consequences of this disruption to the natural flow and the natural rhythm which has shaped the humanity in that land (in China) for millennia. I am of course, again, referring to the problem of aborting female fetuses almost exclusively in favor of raising boys, raising boys and creating the next generation of degenerate and obedient men, in the cause of spreading international Bolshevism. If this is not a crime, a crime against nature and against the Creator, then the word crime has truly lost its meaning, which incidentally is the case in Red China.
Why then, would a man and his wife consider raising a boy as opposed to a girl, and why does it seem like there is a zero-sum game going on here between the interest, material or not, in raising a boy or a girl; why can it not be that a sensible man embraces both his daughter and his son? See, it is also fancy among so-called progressives to call this practice, wrong and misguided as it is, a kind of "rearguard" or "backwards" tradition, but the fact is that there is nothing traditional about aborting female fetuses, and the entire concept of being able and capable of finding out the sex of a fetus is even more monstrous and truly their invention—the "progressives" that is—and the fact that they are now turning around and complaining when they themselves are perfectly capable of seeing why this is so, why it is that what they have been advocating for has turned against, God and nature, and themselves should really be a wake up call for most people, but most people are shut and they will not consider the reality of the matter, monstrous as it always is when we consider the progressive impulse.† In the end, if we allow ourselves to continue on this progressive track for a while, we may conclude in true feminist fashion, read "Feminism", that having a boy or a girl should be of no importance as they are equal in every or, at least, most regards. Verily, in the modern world that would be true, as humanity has been reduced to a kind of residue of what once used to be humanity, and in this materialistic world the difference between men and women, what most boys and girls hopefully grow into, is shrinking and shrinking, and really what has been taking place for the last century in particular is that men and the sacred quality of masculinity has started to default to femininity, because masculinity is no longer needed in this material world, read "Femininity > Masculinity?". I should add here as well, that these changes have been ongoing for a long time and corresponds much more closely with the cosmic environment, read "Disintegration", rather than feminism or the general commotion and confusion of the modern world, but it is still all too relevant to point out these blatant absurdities, and the fact that a man should consider himself a woman and a woman should consider herself a man should be even more proof of this confused modality; and nonetheless even while this modality may seem preposterous, it is still fancy to adopt this warped view of things, aided again by the cosmic forces in question, which again is a proof of the Kali Yuga.
Now, there are differences that must be taken into account when we consider the problem of raising a boy as opposed to raising a girl and here we may be prudent, again, in considering the prognostications of profane science,‡ because the fact is that you would be far better off by raising a girl compared to raising a boy during these cosmic circumstances (conditions): consider the for instance, the fact that boys are about 20% more likely to be affected by certain Leukemias (Cancers) compared to girls,§ or the fact that boys are more likely to be affected by certain very adverse mental conditions that make them sluggish and less effective in the intellectual domain,‖ read "What is Disability?"; the fact is that when you raise boys you would have to be far more prudent and potentially ambitious, but perhaps more so accepting of the fact that their fait may have already been preordained; and what I mean by "preordained" in this context is that their fate may already be that of being completely solidified, for a certain portion of all modern humans, and a growing portion, have been born completely solidified and lost to history, read "The End of History". Now, I am not arguing that you should take the advice of profane science here, but what I am trying to say is that you are going to be better off if you allow yourself to gauge the cosmic environment, if you actually attempt to read the cosmos, read "Dreaming", and as it turns out, it does indeed appear to be the case that you have been destined to raise daughters, at any rate in this iteration of humanity. So yes, there are many problems ahead if you are going to intend, or keep intending, on raising boys, many problems that you more likely than not would not have to face if you instead raised daughters.
Reginald Drax (AKA, M. C. Dutt) – July 21, 2026.
Footnote(s)
* This post would turn into something completely different if I was to delve deeper into the matter of Biblical law, which includes both the Tanakh (תָּנָ״ךְ) and the New Testament and the distinction between Jewish law (הֲלָכָה) and that of the New Testament and as a tertiary point that of the Bulla. Besides, these are distinctions that have been made at different points, depending on the particular perspective being taken into account, which is a further compounding factor.
† I should add that you should consider the "progressive impulse" to be the same thing, or at least equivalent, with that of a kind of demonic presence or force that pulls the individual in question towards the group of clear and obvious deviants, but this effect can be quite hard to overcome and should be more palpable around large groups of insane people, for more on this I direct you to this post: "Ideological Indoctrination".
‡ When it comes to the material world, profane science is actually quite decent, or at any rate "good enough", at describing the world and the limits of the world, and this certainly applies to the raising of kids; allow me to refer to this as the science of calculating the optimal lifespan.
§ This is a source that may or may not be trusted but that is good enough for the purposes of this post, the American National Library of Medicine: Why is acute leukemia more common in males? A possible sex-determined risk linked to the ABO blood group genes; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10391104/; published in May 1999; last updated May 1999; by, N Jackson 1, B S Menon, W Zarina, N Zawawi, and N N Naing.
‖ This is perhaps a more trustworthy source than what I referenced above, Nationwide Children's: Autism Spectrum Disorders: The Difference Between Boys and Girls: https://www.nationwidechildrens.org/family-resources-education/700childrens/2017/04/autism-spectrum-disorders-the-difference-between-boys-and-girls; published on April 21, 2017; last updated on April 21, 2017; featuring Eric Butter, PhD.
_LACMA_M.81.90.8_(2_of_2).jpg)
Comments
Post a Comment