Terrorism

Hindu (ॐ) depiction of
Kali (काली) Attacking Nisumbha (निशुम्भ)

Terrorism |
Saturday – June 20, 2026

There is a lot of talk about "terrorism" and "terror" these days and a lot of it is coming from people and groups who themselves are engaging in what could be called "terrorism", read my mini series about the war in Iran here.

    Now, I must admit that I do not care much for this label as I find it to be another annoying political label that is used against anyone that dares to question the established powers, read "Temporal Power", and besides it is also the case that "terrorism" is a label that relies on the propagation of sentimentalism much more than an objective label that actually can stand on its own, and this is why the label will be applied selectively and subjectively rather than objectively, because a lot of people, as I mentioned above, that engage in what would amount to terrorism, have no problem in using this label against their opponents. I will say this about terrorism as a modern phenomena though: it seems to me in keeping with "the end of history", so to speak that warfare itself should become more and more degenerated, something that I already noted in the past, and really that terrorism has reach the point where warfare has almost reached the limit of the corporeal realm, the individual himself, because after all modern men attach themselves so strongly to their identities, as if it was was a real and legitimate possibility to be identical to more than one thing, preconceived though the are, that it seems quite normal and natural for them to fight among each other on the streets, something that I can assure all readers is a perfectly recent and modern development. Of course, in a way it would be quite right as well to assume that terrorism is a natural extension of democracy, in this case into the realms of violent struggle and the mind, because what terrorism really seeks to establish at the end of the day is mind control, a Kingdom of Satan on Earth, and this last point is something that in particular tends to elude the minds of modern men, read "My Views on Reason". Ask yourself this: what about the modern world and the demands of the modern world, of industrial society, would not make most men insane?

    Indeed, it seems to me that what is really terrorism is the mind control going on, but allow me to further qualify the meaning in this context of "mind control": what I mean by mind control is not so much a deliberate campaign of mind control as much as it constitutes a narrowing of the mental faculties and the intellectual horizon, read "Ideological Indoctrination", because modern men do indeed like to fancy themselves free thinkers and makers of their own destiny, but what is more curios to note about all of these delusions is the fact that most modern men will be more than happy to admit that they in fact lack general autonomy, and that the world that they reside in, both mentally and physically, was made for them to live in without the need to rely on outside forces, on outside intervention, really that the modern world constitutes something quite closed and totalizing, but their defense of their own general lack of knowledge and ability is perhaps more striking, because most of them will indeed go on to freely admit this miserable state of affairs but to them it seems still preferable than real freedom, or what they will refer to as freedom, because of course there is really no "freedom" in the true sense of that word in the modern world. Also, terrorism of the mind is actually what keeps them obedient, obedient to the system. Think about it this way: when everything revolves around materialism, or rather the production of material artifacts, why should a human life matter, and more importantly, why should the supra-human order matter? If it is the case that the corporeal dominates everything else, and such is indeed the case today, it would be expected that everything else, everything that do not fit into this narrow conception of the human condition, should be, for it must be so, pushed aside with a great vengeance, but then it should also be expected that this force against the sacred and the primordial will be meat with an equal and opposing force, read "Destruction!".

    Now, if you wish to call this equal but opposing force "terrorism" there is just nothing that I can do to stop you, unless of course you allow your senses to open up to the supra-human, but this is a point outside the scope of this post. Why is it the case that everyone labels their opponents terrorists these days? Can you oppose the activities and misdeeds of the Western world without being labeled a terrorist, or perhaps worse a so-called terrorist sympathizer these days? Also, there is much talk about "free inquiry" and "open discourse", yet certain topics are not allowed to be debated, because apparently they exist outside of this closed and finite system. Note the word "finite", because indeed the conception and conceptions of the Western mind appear to be not only finite but shrinking, something that is quite expected considering the material and really crude nature of most Westerners, read "Western Hegemony". Yes, I will acknowledge here at the end of this post that indeed terrorism is more often than not explicitly about violence, I have never denied this, but what is the purpose of terrorism if not mind control and fear? See, the crowd is easy to move; once one person starts to panic, it does not take many more to enable the entire mass, the ocean of humanity, to move in one or the other confused directions, and really to confuse is the main point here: it is all too easy to talk about the immediate and physical reality of terrorism, but in the long term it seems quite clear to me that terrorism has a much more profound effect on the entire collective subconscious of the masses, and the ramifications may still be felt by generations much further afield. But then again, just like noise, terrorism aims to not direct the masses in anyone particular direction; terrorism aims to create general confusion and general lack of ability, because panic and emotion, more than anything else, will enable power to reign supreme over true authority, and since modern men concern themselves exclusively with number it is truly the case that great numbers and numbers greater still is what constitutes the basic modality of control – you may not have illegitimate control without terrorism. Besides, true authority does not require control, another modern confusion.

Reginald Drax – June 20, 2026.