The Next 20 Years...

"Building Landmark Landscape"
By harrypham2000

The Next 20 Years...
Thursday – June 18, 2026

The fact is that the next 20 years, the next two decades, will suck, to borrow some modern phraseology. See, most people believe in something called hope, and what hope really is at the end of the day is really something like a fever dream, something that happens to people whether or not they like it, and despite all reason, yes here I am referring to reason in the crude sense, they cling onto hope, while being fed the same ideological junk. Reason, again merely crude reason, has almost ordained that nothing good can happen for some time to come, at least until the end of this latest cycle, read "The Eschatology of the Kali Yuga". Now, I understand that this all may come across as rash, but this is my reading of the future, and yes I would understand the objections going something like this: but if you have decided that everything is going to suck, then it probably will suck; but the fact is that this is not me deciding as much as it is me being guided by intuition and supra-human intelligence towards this position. Now, I will admit that my view of the world and of the world in the future is akin to an image that is only in low resolution, but this is a good thing, for I do not believe that any man that claims proper qualification can be too detailed about these matters, and once again this provides me the opportunity to direct you to my post labeled "Dreaming" for more information about my own claims of the supra-human and supra-individual order. Also, I must admit that I do not care much for details because they simply do not interest me, but again this is a matter for another time, but the fact this: if I am going to include all sorts of details in this post, then I will not have any room for the overriding point and theme, and besides, the more detailed my prediction, the less likely I am to be right, because I am not God.

    From a technological point of view, it is often granted, not by me however, that these machines and the industry raised in their wake will and indeed has "improved" the human condition, but this is only true from a very narrow point of view; for in all other respects it is clear and clearer yet, that what the moderns call "the human condition" is now demonstrably worse compared to any given time in the past, read "The End of History", and this continues to be the case, and has been the case since of at least the year 1312, when the last vestiges of European and Western tradition where destroyed by that tyrant, that abominable pig, Philip IV of France, read "Temporal Power". Of course, is often assumed as well by modern people that this continual destruction of the sacred is a kind of "progress", but I do want to clarify that what most moderns mean by "progress" is in fact entirely different from the fall of man, although it now no longer possible to differentiated the two: if indeed progress used to represent man's will—guided of course by God—progress today represents nothing but decay, disease, and confusion; this confluence occurred in and around the year 1312, at least this is what most scholars agree on and has been ongoing ever since. So, I ask you this: should it be expected that the world somehow will move towards greater heights or should it be expected that the world should continue to spiral towards global catastrophe in the coming two decades, read "Disintegration"? Really, the only thing to expect by the year 2046 is that the world should have deteriorated even further, but at the same time we have now reached a state that is so advanced that it will be ever harder for men to even notice this rapid deterioration, again read "The End of History". Apart from the deterioration of knowledge, which is primarily what I have been referring to above, it is also to be expected that humanity itself should come to lose more and more of its autonomy in favor of machines and these so-called "algorithms", which are nothing but schedules and programs really; schedules made to perfect some kind of clockwork or some kind of prediction. Yes, I may be engaging in predictions of all kinds myself, but my predictions are not really mine; besides, the predictions that I have outlined in this post are based on profound truths. Beyond programs and schedules of all kinds, it is also to be expected that within the next two decades, some kind of eruption of sentimentalism will come to shake democracy to its core, because after all, if it indeed is the case that men may vote against democracy inside democracy, will not democracy yield to this outcry? Or else even more problems may be anticipated further afield...

    No and no, democracy and all the illusions of the humanist axiom are out, or rather they will be out in about two decades, but I should clarify that this will be a process that is still slow enough to not occur overnight, but this does not speak against quick phase of the modern world; rather the quick phase of the modern world is increasingly erasing the boundaries of reference, read "The Problem of Borders". It is also likely the case that because of the confused diffusion of information that most people will even admit that they no longer need or want democracy, read "Navigating the Informational Landscape". Of course, the point when all the illusions aforementioned will be smashed is harder to know, and likely this point will never be reached as that world would require complete solidification and a complete reduction of the essential. Of course, if you are a so-called "optimist", that is to say, if you have made "optimism", another one of those "isms", into your identity, then you may be out of luck, although some profane scientists claims, without evidence of course, that "optimists" tend to live longer, read "When Will You Die?", which will give you just enough time to live through more of the deviation ahead. I am of course being facetious here, but not by that large of a margin, because we may choose to be "optimistic", but I am sure that in about 20 years you will not be so "optimistic", mostly because you will have become ever more numb, read "Fatness", and more beastly. Also, it is actually not hard to rely on intuition in this case, but it would still require some kind of deep contemplation that most people quite frankly cannot access.

Reginald Drax (AKA, M. C. Dutt) – June 18, 2026.